[dpdk-ci] [PATCH v2 2/5] test/hash: remove duplicated test code

[David Marchand]

On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 8:49 PM Honnappa Nagarahalli
<honnappa.nagarahalli at arm.com> wrote:
>
> The test case target 'hash_readwrite_autotest' is covered by
> 'hash_readwrite_func_autotest' and 'hash_readwrite_perf_autotest'.
> Hence, it is removed along with its test code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli at arm.com>
> ---
>  app/test/autotest_data.py      |  10 +++-
>  app/test/test_hash_readwrite.c | 101 ---------------------------------
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/autotest_data.py b/app/test/autotest_data.py
> index 6deb97bcc..71db4b3f6 100644
> --- a/app/test/autotest_data.py
> +++ b/app/test/autotest_data.py
> @@ -664,8 +664,14 @@
>          "Report":  None,
>      },
>      {
> -        "Name":    "Hash read-write concurrency autotest",
> -        "Command": "hash_readwrite_autotest",
> +        "Name":    "Hash read-write concurrency functional autotest",
> +        "Command": "hash_readwrite_func_autotest",
> +        "Func":    default_autotest,
> +        "Report":  None,
> +    },
> +    {
> +        "Name":    "Hash read-write concurrency perf autotest",
> +        "Command": "hash_readwrite_perf_autotest",
>          "Func":    default_autotest,
>          "Report":  None,
>      },
> diff --git a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite.c b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite.c
> index aa55db7fe..635ed5a9f 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite.c
> @@ -749,106 +749,5 @@ test_hash_rw_func_main(void)
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> -static int
> -test_hash_readwrite_main(void)
> -{
> -       /*
> -        * Variables used to choose different tests.
> -        * use_htm indicates if hardware transactional memory should be used.
> -        * reader_faster indicates if the reader threads should finish earlier
> -        * than writer threads. This is to timing either reader threads or
> -        * writer threads for performance numbers.
> -        */
> -       int use_htm, use_ext,  reader_faster;
> -       unsigned int i = 0, core_id = 0;
> -
> -       if (rte_lcore_count() < 3) {
> -               printf("Not enough cores for hash_readwrite_autotest, expecting at least 3\n");
> -               return TEST_SKIPPED;
> -       }
> -
> -       RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_SLAVE(core_id) {
> -               slave_core_ids[i] = core_id;
> -               i++;
> -       }
> -
> -       setlocale(LC_NUMERIC, "");
> -
> -       if (rte_tm_supported()) {
> -               printf("Hardware transactional memory (lock elision) "
> -                       "is supported\n");
> -
> -               printf("Test read-write with Hardware transactional memory\n");
> -
> -               use_htm = 1;
> -               use_ext = 0;
> -
> -               if (test_hash_readwrite_functional(use_ext, use_htm) < 0)
> -                       return -1;
> -
> -               use_ext = 1;
> -               if (test_hash_readwrite_functional(use_ext, use_htm) < 0)
> -                       return -1;
> -
> -               reader_faster = 1;
> -               if (test_hash_readwrite_perf(&htm_results, use_htm,
> -                                                       reader_faster) < 0)
> -                       return -1;
> -
> -               reader_faster = 0;
> -               if (test_hash_readwrite_perf(&htm_results, use_htm,
> -                                                       reader_faster) < 0)
> -                       return -1;
> -       } else {
> -               printf("Hardware transactional memory (lock elision) "
> -                       "is NOT supported\n");
> -       }
> -
> -       printf("Test read-write without Hardware transactional memory\n");
> -       use_htm = 0;
> -       use_ext = 0;
> -       if (test_hash_readwrite_functional(use_ext, use_htm) < 0)
> -               return -1;
> -
> -       use_ext = 1;
> -       if (test_hash_readwrite_functional(use_ext, use_htm) < 0)
> -               return -1;
> -
> -       reader_faster = 1;
> -       if (test_hash_readwrite_perf(&non_htm_results, use_htm,
> -                                                       reader_faster) < 0)
> -               return -1;
> -       reader_faster = 0;
> -       if (test_hash_readwrite_perf(&non_htm_results, use_htm,
> -                                                       reader_faster) < 0)
> -               return -1;
> -
> -       printf("================\n");
> -       printf("Results summary:\n");
> -       printf("================\n");
> -
> -       printf("single read: %u\n", htm_results.single_read);
> -       printf("single write: %u\n", htm_results.single_write);
> -       for (i = 0; i < NUM_TEST; i++) {
> -               printf("+++ core_cnt: %u +++\n", core_cnt[i]);
> -               printf("HTM:\n");
> -               printf("  read only: %u\n", htm_results.read_only[i]);
> -               printf("  write only: %u\n", htm_results.write_only[i]);
> -               printf("  read-write read: %u\n", htm_results.read_write_r[i]);
> -               printf("  read-write write: %u\n", htm_results.read_write_w[i]);
> -
> -               printf("non HTM:\n");
> -               printf("  read only: %u\n", non_htm_results.read_only[i]);
> -               printf("  write only: %u\n", non_htm_results.write_only[i]);
> -               printf("  read-write read: %u\n",
> -                       non_htm_results.read_write_r[i]);
> -               printf("  read-write write: %u\n",
> -                       non_htm_results.read_write_w[i]);
> -       }
> -
> -       return 0;
> -}
> -
> -REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(hash_readwrite_autotest, test_hash_readwrite_main);
>  REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(hash_readwrite_func_autotest, test_hash_rw_func_main);
>  REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(hash_readwrite_perf_autotest, test_hash_rw_perf_main);
> --
> 2.17.1
>

I can see that DTS references this test:
https://git.dpdk.org/tools/dts/tree/tests/TestSuite_unit_tests_eal.py#n164

Travis (and UNH) also runs those unit tests (via the list included in meson).

Is there a reason to keep those in DTS?


Thanks.

--
David Marchand