<div dir="ltr">Hi Zhaoyan,<div> </div><div>Currently, the 40G machine is stable enough to be put on production dashboard to run tests which may cause Trex to be killed.</div><div>Should I disable the 40G Intel machine for you to make changes?</div><div> </div><div>Also, just for confirmation: on the 10G machine, is the folder that you are using for the testing located in /opt/test-harness/dts-2020-3-4, or are you still using the one in the standard /opt/test-harness/dts folder?</div><div> </div><div>If everything is ok, I will enable the 10G machine for production testing.</div><div> </div><div>Thank you very much</div></div> <div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 9:36 PM Chen, Zhaoyan <<a href="mailto:zhaoyan.chen@intel.com">zhaoyan.chen@intel.com</a>> wrote: </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> <div lang="EN-US"> <div class="gmail-m_-6800388195600028051WordSection1"> Brandon, We worked out a workaround on Intel testbeds. NNT(10G) and FVL(40G). Could you please help to recover them? But, for FVL(40G) testbed, we met some problems, could you please help to check before recover it <ul style="margin-top:0in" type="disc"> <li class="gmail-m_-6800388195600028051MsoListParagraph" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);margin-left:0in"> Sometime 1G hugepage will be changed to 2Mhugepage automatically...we have to restart the system</li><li class="gmail-m_-6800388195600028051MsoListParagraph" style="color:rgb(31,73,125);margin-left:0in"> When we debugging on the testbed, found that Trex was killed by some one(app)..</li></ul> Please help to check if any other program running on the testbed. Thanks a lot. <div> Regards, Zhaoyan Chen </div> <div style="border-top:none;border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:1.5pt solid blue;padding:0in 0in 0in 4pt"> <div> <div style="border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:none;border-top:1pt solid rgb(225,225,225);padding:3pt 0in 0in"> From: Chen, Zhaoyan <<a href="mailto:zhaoyan.chen@intel.com" target="_blank">zhaoyan.chen@intel.com</a>> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2020 9:04 PM To: Brandon Lo <<a href="mailto:blo@iol.unh.edu" target="_blank">blo@iol.unh.edu</a>> Cc: David Marchand <<a href="mailto:david.marchand@redhat.com" target="_blank">david.marchand@redhat.com</a>>; <a href="mailto:dpdklab@iol.unh.edu" target="_blank">dpdklab@iol.unh.edu</a>; Lincoln Lavoie <<a href="mailto:lylavoie@iol.unh.edu" target="_blank">lylavoie@iol.unh.edu</a>>; Thomas Monjalon <<a href="mailto:thomas@monjalon.net" target="_blank">thomas@monjalon.net</a>>; <a href="mailto:ci@dpdk.org" target="_blank">ci@dpdk.org</a>; Tu, Lijuan <<a href="mailto:lijuan.tu@intel.com" target="_blank">lijuan.tu@intel.com</a>>; Xu, Qian Q <<a href="mailto:qian.q.xu@intel.com" target="_blank">qian.q.xu@intel.com</a>>; Chen, Zhaoyan <<a href="mailto:zhaoyan.chen@intel.com" target="_blank">zhaoyan.chen@intel.com</a>> Subject: RE: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] Intel performance test is failing </div> </div> Brandon, we almost made a workaround. Maybe tomorrow, you could recover Intel’s testbed. I will let you know soon. Regards, Zhaoyan Chen <div style="border-top:none;border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:1.5pt solid blue;padding:0in 0in 0in 4pt"> <div> <div style="border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:none;border-top:1pt solid rgb(225,225,225);padding:3pt 0in 0in"> From: Brandon Lo <<a href="mailto:blo@iol.unh.edu" target="_blank">blo@iol.unh.edu</a>> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2020 3:34 AM To: Chen, Zhaoyan <<a href="mailto:zhaoyan.chen@intel.com" target="_blank">zhaoyan.chen@intel.com</a>> Cc: David Marchand <<a href="mailto:david.marchand@redhat.com" target="_blank">david.marchand@redhat.com</a>>; <a href="mailto:dpdklab@iol.unh.edu" target="_blank">dpdklab@iol.unh.edu</a>; Lincoln Lavoie <<a href="mailto:lylavoie@iol.unh.edu" target="_blank">lylavoie@iol.unh.edu</a>>; Thomas Monjalon <<a href="mailto:thomas@monjalon.net" target="_blank">thomas@monjalon.net</a>>; <a href="mailto:ci@dpdk.org" target="_blank">ci@dpdk.org</a>; Tu, Lijuan <<a href="mailto:lijuan.tu@intel.com" target="_blank">lijuan.tu@intel.com</a>>; Xu, Qian Q <<a href="mailto:qian.q.xu@intel.com" target="_blank">qian.q.xu@intel.com</a>> Subject: Re: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] Intel performance test is failing </div> </div> <div> Hi Zhaoyan, <div> </div> <div> Have you finished making changes on the Intel machine? </div> <div> I will turn on the machine on March 3rd for testing if you do not have any issues with it. </div> <div> Please let me know if you need anything else. </div> <div> </div> <div> Thanks </div> </div> <div> <div> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:13 PM Chen, Zhaoyan <<a href="mailto:zhaoyan.chen@intel.com" target="_blank">zhaoyan.chen@intel.com</a>> wrote: </div> <blockquote style="border-top:none;border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:1pt solid rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin:5pt 0in 5pt 4.8pt"> <div> <div> Hi, Brandon, Yes, it’s a wired issue. And it also mixed our DTS upgrading and Trex upgrading. So we are reviewing our DTS script, different Trex version, and CI calling procedure. Anyway, we are focusing on this task recently, any update will let you know. Thanks. Regards, Zhaoyan Chen <div style="border-top:none;border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:1.5pt solid blue;padding:0in 0in 0in 4pt"> <div> <div style="border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:none;border-top:1pt solid rgb(225,225,225);padding:3pt 0in 0in"> From: Brandon Lo <<a href="mailto:blo@iol.unh.edu" target="_blank">blo@iol.unh.edu</a>> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 10:46 PM To: David Marchand <<a href="mailto:david.marchand@redhat.com" target="_blank">david.marchand@redhat.com</a>> Cc: Chen, Zhaoyan <<a href="mailto:zhaoyan.chen@intel.com" target="_blank">zhaoyan.chen@intel.com</a>>; <a href="mailto:dpdklab@iol.unh.edu" target="_blank">dpdklab@iol.unh.edu</a>; Lincoln Lavoie <<a href="mailto:lylavoie@iol.unh.edu" target="_blank">lylavoie@iol.unh.edu</a>>; Thomas Monjalon <<a href="mailto:thomas@monjalon.net" target="_blank">thomas@monjalon.net</a>>; <a href="mailto:ci@dpdk.org" target="_blank">ci@dpdk.org</a>; Tu, Lijuan <<a href="mailto:lijuan.tu@intel.com" target="_blank">lijuan.tu@intel.com</a>>; Xu, Qian Q <<a href="mailto:qian.q.xu@intel.com" target="_blank">qian.q.xu@intel.com</a>> Subject: Re: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] Intel performance test is failing </div> </div> <div> Hi Zhaoyan, <div> </div> <div> How is the current status of the Intel 82599ES? </div> <div> Were there any configuration changes made to fix performance issues? </div> <div> </div> <div> Thanks </div> </div> <div> <div> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 9:11 AM Brandon Lo <<a href="mailto:blo@iol.unh.edu" target="_blank">blo@iol.unh.edu</a>> wrote: </div> <blockquote style="border-top:none;border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:1pt solid rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin:5pt 0in 5pt 4.8pt"> <div> Hi David, <div> </div> <div> This was just a weird issue with the packet generator not cleaning itself after a test fast enough before another test. </div> <div> I'll rerun the tests that were affected and keep an eye out to see if it's stable enough to be put back online. </div> <div> </div> <div> Thanks </div> </div> <div> <div> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 5:33 AM David Marchand <<a href="mailto:david.marchand@redhat.com" target="_blank">david.marchand@redhat.com</a>> wrote: </div> <blockquote style="border-top:none;border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:1pt solid rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin:5pt 0in 5pt 4.8pt"> On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 3:14 PM Brandon Lo <<a href="mailto:blo@iol.unh.edu" target="_blank">blo@iol.unh.edu</a>> wrote: > > Hi David and Zhaoyan, > > > Yes, those results are related to the Intel machine; I have disabled testing for the Intel testbed. > > The 82599ES machine is now available for ssh and modifications. Any news about this? I received a failure on a patch of mine (changing macros in a ARM header). <a href="https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/9900/" target="_blank">https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/9900/</a> But this time, it is with the 40G Intel nic test. -- David Marchand </blockquote> </div> <div> </div> -- <div> <div> <div> <div> Brandon Lo UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 <a href="mailto:blo@iol.unh.edu" target="_blank">blo@iol.unh.edu</a> <a href="http://www.iol.unh.edu/" target="_blank">www.iol.unh.edu</a> </div> </div> </div> </div> </blockquote> </div> <div> </div> -- <div> <div> <div> <div> Brandon Lo UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 <a href="mailto:blo@iol.unh.edu" target="_blank">blo@iol.unh.edu</a> <a href="http://www.iol.unh.edu/" target="_blank">www.iol.unh.edu</a> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </blockquote> </div> <div> </div> -- <div> <div> <div> <div> Brandon Lo UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 <a href="mailto:blo@iol.unh.edu" target="_blank">blo@iol.unh.edu</a> <a href="http://www.iol.unh.edu/" target="_blank">www.iol.unh.edu</a> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </blockquote></div> <div> </div>-- <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr">Brandon LoUNH InterOperability Laboratory21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824<a href="mailto:blo@iol.unh.edu" target="_blank">blo@iol.unh.edu</a><a href="http://www.iol.unh.edu/" target="_blank">www.iol.unh.edu</a></div></div></div></div>