<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Hi David,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Did you get any response to this from the Intel folks?  Should we add a bug to track this for discussion / review at our meeting next week?</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Cheers,<br>Lincoln</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:07 AM David Marchand <<a href="mailto:david.marchand@redhat.com">david.marchand@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hello,<br>
<br>
(It looks like I have no luck with CI those days... :-)).<br>
<br>
All patches of a series of mine<br>
(<a href="https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=10551" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=10551</a>) are<br>
marked as failing all compilation in Intel CI.<br>
<br>
- Is it normal to see all patches with the exact same test report?<br>
Patch 1: <a href="http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2020-June/137872.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2020-June/137872.html</a><br>
Patch 9: <a href="http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2020-June/137880.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2020-June/137880.html</a><br>
<br>
UNH and ovsrobot only report once when testing a full series.<br>
It makes more sense if Intel CI only tests full series.<br>
<br>
<br>
- Putting the first point aside, and focusing on patch 9 error:<br>
<a href="http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2020-June/137880.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2020-June/137880.html</a><br>
<br>
../drivers/mempool/bucket/rte_mempool_bucket.c: In function ‘bucket_get_count’:<br>
../drivers/mempool/bucket/rte_mempool_bucket.c:400:2: error: implicit<br>
declaration of function ‘rte_lcore_iterate’; did you mean<br>
‘rte_lcore_is_enabled’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]<br>
  rte_lcore_iterate(count_per_lcore, &ctx);<br>
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br>
  rte_lcore_is_enabled<br>
../drivers/mempool/bucket/rte_mempool_bucket.c:400:2: error: nested<br>
extern declaration of ‘rte_lcore_iterate’ [-Werror=nested-externs]<br>
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors<br>
<br>
<br>
This function is defined in rte_lcore.h which does seem to be<br>
included, seeing how the compiler suggests another<br>
rte_lcore_is_enabled function.<br>
The v2 revision passed fine<br>
(<a href="http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2020-June/137552.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2020-June/137552.html</a>) and<br>
I see no change in v3 that would break like this.<br>
<br>
I am a bit puzzled...<br>
One thing that comes to mind, do we have dpdk headers installed<br>
system-wide on the Intel CI server(s)?<br>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
David Marchand<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><b>Lincoln Lavoie</b><br></div><div>Senior Engineer, Broadband Technologies</div><div>21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824</div><div><a href="mailto:lylavoie@iol.unh.edu" target="_blank">lylavoie@iol.unh.edu</a></div><div><a href="https://www.iol.unh.edu" target="_blank">https://www.iol.unh.edu</a></div><div>+1-603-674-2755 (m)<br></div><div><a href="https://www.iol.unh.edu/" target="_blank"><img src="http://homeautomation.lavoieholdings.com/_/rsrc/1390068882701/unh-iol-logo.png"></a></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>