<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"> <style></style> </head> <body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word"> <div class="WordSection1"> Thank you David for helping with the rerun! The dashboard now is updated and the previous failed test passed: <a href="http://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/1620241931-28435-11-git-send-email-jizh@linux.microsoft.com/"> [v13,10/10] app/testpmd: enable building testpmd on Windows - Patchwork (dpdk.org)</a>.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> + Ferruh just FYI on the current test results as this patch set is delegated to you.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Thanks.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Jie<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in"> From: David Liu <dliu@iol.unh.edu> Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 1:30 PM To: Jie Zhou <jizh@microsoft.com> Cc: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>; ci@dpdk.org; Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu>; Owen Hilyard <ohilyard@iol.unh.edu>; Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu> Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [EXTERNAL] Re: Help with a rerun of failed ci/iol-intel-functional<o:p></o:p> </div> <o:p> </o:p> <div> Hi,<o:p></o:p> <div> <o:p> </o:p> </div> <div> The rerun has been kick off. The test result on the patchwork will be updated shortly. Thank,<o:p></o:p> </div> <div> David<o:p></o:p> </div> </div> <o:p> </o:p> <div> <div> On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 12:26 PM Jie Zhou <<a href="mailto:jizh@microsoft.com" target="_blank">jizh@microsoft.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p> </div> <blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt"> Thanks Aaron! -----Original Message----- From: Aaron Conole <<a href="mailto:aconole@redhat.com" target="_blank">aconole@redhat.com</a>> Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 5:47 AM To: Jie Zhou <<a href="mailto:jizh@microsoft.com" target="_blank">jizh@microsoft.com</a>> Cc: <a href="mailto:ci@dpdk.org" target="_blank">ci@dpdk.org</a>; Brandon Lo <<a href="mailto:blo@iol.unh.edu" target="_blank">blo@iol.unh.edu</a>>; Owen Hilyard <<a href="mailto:ohilyard@iol.unh.edu" target="_blank">ohilyard@iol.unh.edu</a>>; Lincoln Lavoie <<a href="mailto:lylavoie@iol.unh.edu" target="_blank">lylavoie@iol.unh.edu</a>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [dpdk-ci] Help with a rerun of failed ci/iol-intel-functional Jie Zhou <<a href="mailto:jizh@microsoft.com" target="_blank">jizh@microsoft.com</a>> writes: > Hi, > > > > This patchset > (<a href="https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpatc" target="_blank">https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpatc</a> > <a href="https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhwork.dpdk.org%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cjizh%40microsoft.com%7Caa8ebdae8b5e410828c208d911970561%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637560162608195912%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=BCmbFYYz6UzMvQATiUTBV5S38xK3PfHNv2nihSvY5%2Bg%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank"> hwork.dpdk.org</a>%2Fproject%2Fdpdk%2Fpatch%2F1620241931-28435-11-git-send > -email-jizh%<a href="https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40linux.microsoft.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cjizh%40microsoft.com%7Caa8ebdae8b5e410828c208d911970561%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637560162608195912%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=1JGX%2B1MpigA9YSLmhMDVl3Q%2FWbjdQwsl%2BpQ5Q52%2Fgbo%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank">40linux.microsoft.com</a>%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cjizh%40microso > <a href="https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fft.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cjizh%40microsoft.com%7Caa8ebdae8b5e410828c208d911970561%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637560162608205911%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=hMIsgOphwv6W6nVg5hQC%2Fyror%2Fx7L4bZ41HslOFszhw%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank"> ft.com</a>%7C312abec10018483bdbea08d911565a50%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd0 > 11db47%7C1%7C0%7C637559884846642838%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC > 4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sd > ata=FOtKE7%2BzuGhSR1uIZSCdvnKJ31oQgq1o6RE6U1KuGno%3D&reserved=0) > hit CI lab test failure on ci/iol-intel-functional > (<a href="https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flab" target="_blank">https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flab</a> > .<a href="https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdpdk.org%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cjizh%40microsoft.com%7Caa8ebdae8b5e410828c208d911970561%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637560162608215906%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=zDLnsqk%2FM8gL%2F53zAHmzVstStAQqUrkr5Mfgo2%2Fjxuc%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank">dpdk.org</a>%2Fresults%2Fdashboard%2Fpatchsets%2F16955%2F&data=04%7C0 > 1%7Cjizh%<a href="https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40microsoft.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cjizh%40microsoft.com%7Caa8ebdae8b5e410828c208d911970561%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637560162608225899%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=o%2FWz4F7HoGksv%2FMiD0UXeBYL0KJolP2TSRw0jHIcQIs%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank">40microsoft.com</a>%7C312abec10018483bdbea08d911565a50%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637559884846652833%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=74kKnF9U1d%2Fy10TqMkDZE4kdiVCtZbWkWz4R7KJWS4Y%3D&reserved=0). Per looking at the log, don't see how that is related to the change from this patchset (previous versions passed this test and this V13 just trivially resolve a header file 1 line patch apply conflict). Wondering if is it possible that you help with rerun this test for the patchset to see the failure is intermittent or not? Appreciate your help! I see errors like: ------------------------------------ Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/supersocket.py", line 134, in __del__ self.close() File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/arch/linux.py", line 514, in close set_promisc(self.ins, self.iface, 0) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/arch/linux.py", line 165, in set_promisc mreq = struct.pack("IHH8s", get_if_index(iff), PACKET_MR_PROMISC, 0, b"") File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/arch/linux.py", line 380, in get_if_index return int(struct.unpack("I", get_if(iff, SIOCGIFINDEX)[16:20])[0]) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/arch/common.py", line 59, in get_if ifreq = ioctl(sck, cmd, struct.pack("16s16x", iff.encode("utf8"))) OSError: [Errno 19] No such device ------------------------------------ File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/pexpect/spawnbase.py", line 166, in read_nonblocking s = os.read(self.child_fd, size) OSError: [Errno 5] Input/output error ------------------------------------ Looks like it's something in the infrastructure or configuration of the HW. CC'd the lab folks. > > > Thanks. > > > > Jie<o:p></o:p> </blockquote> </div> </div> </body> </html>