<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink="#954F72" style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>Hi All,<br><br>I can rerun this patch for you, and look into why the original run failed.<br><br>Regards,<br>Adam Hassick</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div style='mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal style='border:none;padding:0in'><b>From: </b><a href="mailto:aconole@redhat.com">Aaron Conole</a><br><b>Sent: </b>Wednesday, June 22, 2022 11:22 AM<br><b>To: </b><a href="mailto:ganapati.kundapura@intel.com">Kundapura, Ganapati</a><br><b>Cc: </b><a href="mailto:ahassick@iol.unh.edu">Adam Hassick</a>; <a href="mailto:dpdk-test-reports@iol.unh.edu">dpdk-test-reports@iol.unh.edu</a>; <a href="mailto:dpdklab@iol.unh.edu">dpdklab@iol.unh.edu</a>; <a href="mailto:test-report@dpdk.org">test-report@dpdk.org</a>; <a href="mailto:jay.jayatheerthan@intel.com">Jayatheerthan, Jay</a>; <a href="mailto:jerinj@marvell.com">jerinj@marvell.com</a>; <a href="mailto:ci@dpdk.org">ci@dpdk.org</a><br><b>Subject: </b>Re: |WARNING| pw113233-113239 [PATCH] [v7, 7/7] doc/eth_tx: update instance get API</p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Greeting Ganapati,</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>"Kundapura, Ganapati" <ganapati.kundapura@intel.com> writes:</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>> Hi Brandon,</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Brandon left the lab in April. I've CC'd Adam Hassick, who I think can</p><p class=MsoNormal>probably help.</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>> This patch is reporting apply warnings</p><p class=MsoNormal>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>> https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/22745/</p><p class=MsoNormal>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>> </p><p class=MsoNormal>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>> Test-Label: iol-testing</p><p class=MsoNormal>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>> Test-Status: WARNING</p><p class=MsoNormal>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>> http://dpdk.org/patch/113233</p><p class=MsoNormal>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>> </p><p class=MsoNormal>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>> _apply patch failure_</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Looks like there was a race with updating vs. submitting.</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Agree - this should be rerun.</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>> Submitter: Ganapati Kundapura <ganapati.kundapura at intel.com></p><p class=MsoNormal>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>> Date: Wednesday, June 22 2022 10:37:56 </p><p class=MsoNormal>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>> Applied on: CommitID:9aa95b6fc4d0f166f8364f60c476f52dfcbe1082</p><p class=MsoNormal>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>> Apply patch set 113233-113239 failed:</p><p class=MsoNormal>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>> But it seems that it’s trying to apply on the wrong commit </p><p class=MsoNormal>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>> Applied on dpdk (9aa95b6fc4d0f166f8364f60c476f52dfcbe1082)</p><p class=MsoNormal>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>> </p><p class=MsoNormal>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>> I’m able to apply it on the latest commits of dpdk and dpdk-next-eventdev.</p><p class=MsoNormal>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Thanks for confirming that at least this can apply and execute on</p><p class=MsoNormal>3227bc7138f5afd7593c0eb4dd6b52710f4193b7 ("crypto/qat: use intel-ipsec-mb for partial hash and AES")</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>> Most probably the next-eventdev tree is off sync in the lab, can you please check it?</p><p class=MsoNormal>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>> And after the issue is resolved, can you please re-trigger the test for mentioned patch?</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I think this should be doable.</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>> Thanks,</p><p class=MsoNormal>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>> Ganapati</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>