[dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function

Ilan Borenshtein ilan at asocstech.com
Sun Aug 17 09:34:04 CEST 2014


Is there any other way except of the Flow director to use the different Rx queues by a VF ?
Will the next versions support flow director for VF ?

Ilan B

-----Original Message-----
From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu at intel.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 10:51 AM
To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function


Flow director is not supported on VF now.
I think this may be the reason why ENOTSUP is returned.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ilan Borenshtein
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 8:34 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function
> Hello,
> I'm trying to configure the flow director of VF 82599 port using 
> rte_eth_dev_fdir_add_signature_filter ().
> The function returns with ENOTSUP.
> Doe's flow director supported for VF ?
> What can be the reason for ENOTSUP ?
> Thanks,
> Ilan B

More information about the dev mailing list