[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Single virtio implementation

[Ouyang, Changchun]

Hi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Qiu, Michael
> Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 11:23 AM
> To: Ouyang, Changchun; Thomas Monjalon; Stephen Hemminger
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Single virtio implementation
> 
> On 12/9/2014 9:11 AM, Ouyang, Changchun wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> >> Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 5:31 PM
> >> To: Ouyang, Changchun
> >> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Single virtio
> >> implementation
> >>
> >> Hi Changchun,
> >>
> >> 2014-12-08 14:21, Ouyang Changchun:
> >>> This patch set bases on two original RFC patch sets from Stephen
> >> Hemminger[stephen at networkplumber.org]
> >>> Refer to [http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-August/004845.html ]
> >>> for
> >> the original one.
> >>> This patch set also resolves some conflict with latest codes and
> >>> removed
> >> duplicated codes.
> >>
> >> As you sent the patches, you appear as the author.
> >> But I guess Stephen should be the author for some of them.
> >> Please check who has contributed the most in each patch to decide.
> > You are right, most of patches originate from Stephen's patchset,
> > except for the last one, To be honest, I am ok whoever is the author
> > of this patch set, :-), We could co-own the feature of Single virtio
> > if you all agree with it, and I think we couldn't finish Such a
> > feature without collaboration among us, this is why I tried to communicate
> with most of you to collect more feedback, suggestion and comments for this
> feature.
> > Very appreciate for all kinds of feedback, suggestion here, especially for
> patch set from Stephen.
> >
> > According to your request, how could we make this patch set looks more
> like Stephen as the author?
> > Currently I add Stephen as Signed-off-by list in each patch(I got the
> agreement from Stephen before doing this :-)).
> 
> Hi Ouyang,
> 
> "Signed-off-by" should be added by himself, because the one who in the
> Signed-off-by list should take responsibility for it(like potential bugs/issues).
> 
> Although, lots of patches are originate from Stephen, we still need himself
> add this line :)

Hi Thomas, 
It that right? I can't add Stephen into Signed-off-by list even if I have gotten the agreement from Stephen,
What 's the strict rule here?

Thanks
Changchun