[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: allow virtual devices to be white/black listed

Neil Horman nhorman at tuxdriver.com
Mon Nov 17 15:10:50 CET 2014


On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 09:26:55PM +0000, Nicolás Pernas Maradei wrote:
> From: Nicolás Pernas Maradei <nico at emutex.com>
> 
> Virtual and physical devices are now treated the same in terms of
> white/black listing. Virtual devices can be defined using --vdev as
> before and also whitelisted (using -w vdev_name) or blacklisted (using -b
> vdev_name). This allows the user to have only a virtual device (port) in
> use.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolás Pernas Maradei <nico at emutex.com>
> ---
>  app/test-pmd/cmdline.c                      |   5 +-
>  app/test/commands.c                         |   4 +-
>  app/test/test_devargs.c                     |  69 +++++-----
>  app/test/test_pci.c                         |   3 +-
>  lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c             |   8 +-
>  lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_pci.c         |   2 +-
>  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c      |  24 ++--
>  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_devargs.c  | 196 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c  |  11 +-
>  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_pci.c      |  11 +-
>  lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_devargs.h | 124 +++++++++++++-----
>  lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c           |   8 +-
>  lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci.c       |   2 +-
>  13 files changed, 319 insertions(+), 148 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> index 4c3fc76..f6ba4fe 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> @@ -6844,6 +6844,8 @@ static void cmd_dump_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>  		rte_mempool_list_dump(stdout);
>  	else if (!strcmp(res->dump, "dump_devargs"))
>  		rte_eal_devargs_dump(stdout);
> +	else if (!strcmp(res->dump, "dump_vdevargs"))
> +		rte_eal_vdevargs_dump(stdout);
>  }
>  
>  cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_dump_dump =
> @@ -6854,7 +6856,8 @@ cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_dump_dump =
>  		"dump_struct_sizes#"
>  		"dump_ring#"
>  		"dump_mempool#"
> -		"dump_devargs");
> +		"dump_devargs#"
> +		"dump_vdevargs");
>  
>  cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_dump = {
>  	.f = cmd_dump_parsed,  /* function to call */
> diff --git a/app/test/commands.c b/app/test/commands.c
> index 92a17ed..6799d63 100644
> --- a/app/test/commands.c
> +++ b/app/test/commands.c
> @@ -161,13 +161,15 @@ static void cmd_dump_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>  		rte_mempool_list_dump(stdout);
>  	else if (!strcmp(res->dump, "dump_devargs"))
>  		rte_eal_devargs_dump(stdout);
> +	else if (!strcmp(res->dump, "dump_vdevargs"))
> +		rte_eal_vdevargs_dump(stdout);
>  }
>  
>  cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_dump_dump =
>  	TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_dump_result, dump,
>  				 "dump_physmem#dump_memzone#dump_log_history#"
>  				 "dump_struct_sizes#dump_ring#dump_mempool#"
> -				 "dump_devargs");
> +				 "dump_devargs#dump_vdevargs");
>  
>  cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_dump = {
>  	.f = cmd_dump_parsed,  /* function to call */
> diff --git a/app/test/test_devargs.c b/app/test/test_devargs.c
> index f0acf8e..8fb93df 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_devargs.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_devargs.c
> @@ -52,52 +52,60 @@ static void free_devargs_list(void)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +/* clear vdevargs list that was modified by the test */
> +static void free_vdevargs_list(void)
> +{
> +	struct rte_vdevargs *vdevargs;
> +
> +	while (!TAILQ_EMPTY(&vdevargs_list)) {
> +		vdevargs = TAILQ_FIRST(&vdevargs_list);
> +		TAILQ_REMOVE(&vdevargs_list, vdevargs, next);
> +		free(vdevargs);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static int
>  test_devargs(void)
>  {
>  	struct rte_devargs_list save_devargs_list;
> +	struct rte_vdevargs_list save_vdevargs_list;
>  	struct rte_devargs *devargs;
> +	struct rte_vdevargs *vdevargs;
>  
>  	/* save the real devargs_list, it is restored at the end of the test */
>  	save_devargs_list = devargs_list;
> +	save_vdevargs_list = vdevargs_list;
>  	TAILQ_INIT(&devargs_list);
> +	TAILQ_INIT(&vdevargs_list);
>  
>  	/* test valid cases */
> -	if (rte_eal_devargs_add(RTE_DEVTYPE_WHITELISTED_PCI, "08:00.1") < 0)
> -		goto fail;
> -	if (rte_eal_devargs_add(RTE_DEVTYPE_WHITELISTED_PCI, "0000:5:00.0") < 0)
> -		goto fail;
> -	if (rte_eal_devargs_add(RTE_DEVTYPE_BLACKLISTED_PCI, "04:00.0,arg=val") < 0)
> -		goto fail;
> -	if (rte_eal_devargs_add(RTE_DEVTYPE_BLACKLISTED_PCI, "0000:01:00.1") < 0)
> +	if (rte_eal_devargs_add(RTE_DEV_WHITELISTED, "08:00.1") < 0)
>  		goto fail;
> -	if (rte_eal_devargs_type_count(RTE_DEVTYPE_WHITELISTED_PCI) != 2)
> +	if (rte_eal_devargs_add(RTE_DEV_WHITELISTED, "0000:5:00.0") < 0)
>  		goto fail;
> -	if (rte_eal_devargs_type_count(RTE_DEVTYPE_BLACKLISTED_PCI) != 2)
> +	if (rte_eal_devargs_add(RTE_DEV_BLACKLISTED, "04:00.0") < 0)
>  		goto fail;
> -	if (rte_eal_devargs_type_count(RTE_DEVTYPE_VIRTUAL) != 0)
> +	if (rte_eal_devargs_add(RTE_DEV_BLACKLISTED, "0000:01:00.1") < 0)
>  		goto fail;
What are the above pci bus/device/function tuples?

Neil



More information about the dev mailing list