[dpdk-dev] Mellanox Flow Steering
olgas at mellanox.com
Sun Apr 12 22:39:08 CEST 2015
You are right with your observations, Mellanox PMD and mlx4_en (kernel driver) are co-exist.
When DPDK application run, all traffic is redirected to DPDK application. When DPDK application exit the traffic is received by mlx4_en driver.
Regarding ethtool configuration you did, it influence only mlx4_en driver, it doesn't influence Mellanox PMD queues.
Mellanox PMD doesn't support Flow Director, like you mention, and we are working to add it.
Currently the only way to spread traffic between different PMD queues is using RSS.
From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Raghav Sethi
Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2015 7:18 PM
To: Zhou, Danny; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Mellanox Flow Steering
Thanks, that's helpful. However, Mellanox cards don't support Intel Flow Director, so how would one go about installing these rules in the NIC? The only technique the Mellanox User Manual (
lists to use Flow Steering is the ethtool based method.
Additionally, the mlx4_core driver is used both by DPDK PMD and otherwise (unlike the igb_uio driver, which needs to be loaded to use PMD) and it seems weird that only the packets affected by the rules don't hit the DPDK application. That indicates to me that the NIC is dealing with the rules somehow even though a DPDK application is running.
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 7:47 AM Zhou, Danny <danny.zhou at intel.com> wrote:
> Currently, the DPDK PMD and NIC kernel driver cannot drive a same NIC
> device simultaneously. When you use ethtool to setup flow director
> filter, the rules are written to NIC via ethtool support in kernel
> driver. But when DPDK PMD is loaded to drive same device, the rules
> previously written by ethtool/kernel_driver will be invalid, so you
> may have to use DPDK APIs to rewrite your rules to the NIC again.
> The bifurcated driver is designed to provide a solution to support the
> kernel driver and DPDK coexist scenarios, but it has security concern
> so netdev maintainer rejects it.
> It should not be a Mellanox hardware problem, if you try it on Intel
> NIC the result is same.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Raghav Sethi
> > Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2015 1:10 PM
> > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Mellanox Flow Steering
> > Hi folks,
> > I'm trying to use the flow steering features of the Mellanox card to
> > effectively use a multicore server for a benchmark.
> > The system has a single-port Mellanox ConnectX-3 EN, and I want to
> > use 4
> > the 32 cores present and 4 of the 16 RX queues supported by the
> > hardware (i.e. one RX queue per core).
> > I assign RX queues to each of the cores, but obviously without flow
> > steering (all the packets have the same IP and UDP headers, but
> > different dest MACs in the ethernet headers) each of the packets hits one core.
> > set up the client such that it sends packets with a different
> > destination MAC for each RX queue (e.g. RX queue 1 should get
> > 10:00:00:00:00:00, RX queue 2 should get 10:00:00:00:00:01 and so on).
> > I try to accomplish this by using ethtool to set flow steering rules
> > ethtool -U p7p1 flow-type ether dst 10:00:00:00:00:00 action 1 loc
> > 1, ethtool -U p7p1 flow-type ether dst 10:00:00:00:00:01 action 2 loc 2..).
> > As soon as I set up these rules though, packets matching them just
> > stop hitting my application. All other packets go through, and
> > removing the rules also causes the packets to go through. I'm pretty
> > sure my
> > is looking at all the queues, but I tried changing the rules to try
> > a
> > for every single destination RX queue (0-16), and that doesn't work
> > If it helps, my code is based on the l2fwd sample application, and
> > is
> > https://gist.github.com/raghavsethi/416fb77d74ccf81bd93e
> > Also, I added the following to my /etc/init.d: options mlx4_core
> > log_num_mgm_entry_size=-1, and restarted the driver before any of
> > these tests.
> > Any ideas what might be causing my packets to drop? In case this is
> > a Mellanox issue, should I be talking to their customer support?
> > Best,
> > Raghav Sethi
More information about the dev