[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones

[Zoltan Kiss]

On 27/04/15 18:38, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-04-24 11:38, Zoltan Kiss:
>> On 22/04/15 12:59, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>>> From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 10:57 AM
>>>> The first objective of this series is to fix the support of indirect
>>>> mbufs when the application reserves a private area in mbufs. It also
>>>> removes the limitation that rte_pktmbuf_clone() is only allowed on
>>>> direct (non-cloned) mbufs. The series also contains some enhancements
>>>> and fixes in the mbuf area that makes the implementation of the
>>>> last patches easier.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>
>>
>> When does this series get merged?
>
> It was acked on April 22  and your question was 2 days later on April 24.
> Does it mean you are expecting it to be merged the day it is acked?

I was just curious about when to expect it, so I can plan to do some 
further work based on it, but nothing pressing.

Regards,

Zoltan

> Or do you fear the merging because of a local dev you are working on?
> Anyway, everybody seems happy with this version so it's going to be merged.
>