[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] Add virtio support in arm/arm64

[Santosh Shukla]

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Xie, Huawei <huawei.xie at intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com]
>> Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 10:12 AM
>> To: Santosh Shukla
>> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com; Xie, Huawei
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add virtio support in arm/arm64
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 11:05:13PM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote:
>> > This patch set add basic infrastrucure to run virtio-net-pci pmd driver
>> for
>> > arm64/arm. Tested on ThunderX platfrom. Verified for existing dpdk(s)
>> test
>> > applications like:
>> > - ovs-dpdk-vhost-user: across the VM's, for the use-cases like
>> guest2guest and
>> >   Host2Guest
>> > - testpmd application: Tested for max virtio-net-pci interface currently
>> >   supported in kernel i.e. 31 interface.
>>
>>
>> Hi Santosh,
>>
>> Here is a quick notice that I don't have time to review your patches
>> this one or two weeks. Sorry for that.
>>
>> (Not quite sure Huawei has the bandwidth or not, btw)
> Sorry, just back from vocation. We will review your patch.

Ping,

I have started working on V2 patch set based on review comment so far
received. It would be  great if I get your review comment too.

Also few of my patch code base changes for V2 version gonna overlap
with Yuanhan latest virtio 1.0 patch set titled "[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6
for 2.3] initial virtio 1.0 enabling ", Specially patch 4 and 5. So I
would appreciate any review feedback. That avoid overlapping for me.
Some questions though:
- Shall I rebase Yuanhan's virtio 1.0 patch set, then start v2? By
doing that I could leverage "viritio: switch to 64 bit features". In
this patch series, I did took care of 32 bit vs 64 bit changes for
arm64 case.

>>
>>       --yliu