[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bond: changed slave_id to uint8_t to prevent data loss
Maciej Gajdzica
maciejx.t.gajdzica at intel.com
Fri Feb 20 17:12:22 CET 2015
In some places slave_id is declared as uint16_t, which causes data loss
when using functions expecting port_id as uint8_t. Issue found with
static code analysis tool.
Signed-off-by: Maciej Gajdzica <maciejx.t.gajdzica at intel.com>
---
lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c b/lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
index f1cf81a..97a828e 100644
--- a/lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
+++ b/lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
@@ -747,7 +747,7 @@ bond_mode_8023ad_periodic_cb(void *arg)
struct ether_addr slave_addr;
void *pkt = NULL;
- uint16_t i, slave_id;
+ uint8_t i, slave_id;
/* Update link status on each port */
@@ -1050,7 +1050,7 @@ int
bond_mode_8023ad_enable(struct rte_eth_dev *bond_dev)
{
struct bond_dev_private *internals = bond_dev->data->dev_private;
- uint16_t i;
+ uint8_t i;
for (i = 0; i < internals->active_slave_count; i++)
bond_mode_8023ad_activate_slave(bond_dev, i);
--
1.7.9.5
More information about the dev
mailing list