[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 05/18] librte_acl: fix a bug at build phase that can cause matches beeing overwirtten.

[Ananyev, Konstantin]

Hi Neil,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com]
> Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2015 5:35 PM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 05/18] librte_acl: fix a bug at build phase that can cause matches beeing overwirtten.
> 
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 06:40:54PM +0000, Konstantin Ananyev wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/librte_acl/acl_bld.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_acl/acl_bld.c b/lib/librte_acl/acl_bld.c
> > index 8bf4a54..22f7934 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_acl/acl_bld.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_acl/acl_bld.c
> > @@ -1907,7 +1907,7 @@ rte_acl_build(struct rte_acl_ctx *ctx, const struct rte_acl_config *cfg)
> >  				bcx.num_tries, bcx.cfg.num_categories,
> >  				RTE_ACL_MAX_FIELDS * RTE_DIM(bcx.tries) *
> >  				sizeof(ctx->data_indexes[0]),
> > -				bcx.num_build_rules);
> > +				bcx.num_build_rules + 1);
> >  		if (rc == 0) {
> >
> >  			/* set data indexes. */
> > --
> > 1.8.5.3
> >
> >
> Shouldn't you add to num_build_rules inside rte_acl_gen?  That way other future
> users of the function don't have to remember to do so.

In that patch, I just fix the bug to stop generate invalid tries for some corener cases.
In the later patch in that set, I did something similar to what you are suggesting here -
make rte_acl_gen() to allocate indexes for all match nodes too (as it already doing for all other nodes).
See  [PATCH v3 07/18] librte_acl: build/gen phase - simplify the way match nodes are allocated.

Konstantin

> Neil