[dpdk-dev] How to prevent KNI interface from getting deleted on application termination?

Gopakumar Choorakkot Edakkunni gopakumar.c.e at gmail.com
Thu Jul 9 16:51:59 CEST 2015


Crash is just one example I called out, the other example is a hotfix
update to the app which ends up gracefully restarting the app.

Rgds,
Gopa.

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Marc Sune <marc.sune at bisdn.de> wrote:
>
>
> On 09/07/15 08:36, Gopakumar Choorakkot Edakkunni wrote:
>>
>> Reading through the KNI module source, doesnt look like there is a way
>> to do this. For my requirement, I will make some patch tomorrow to
>> have a module option to just keep the KNI data structures around even
>> if /dev/kni is closed, looks straightforward to do from the code
>>
>> Rgds,
>> Gopa.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Gopakumar Choorakkot Edakkunni
>> <gopakumar.c.e at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> My application takes over one/multiple ethernet port(s) in a linux
>>> system and creates KNI interfaces corresponding to them. So if there
>>> was eth0 and eth1 in the non-dpdk mode, once I take over the ports
>>> using dpdk, I create eth0 and eth1 KNI interfaces. As far as the linux
>>> network managers are concerned, they dont really know about it (or
>>> care I guess) - for example the dhcp client tries getting a dhcp
>>> address over these KNI interfaces and succeeds.
>>>
>>> Now if my application crashes, I dont want the entire network
>>> management subsystem on linux and the hotplugs and this and that to
>>> get alarmed and routes to vanish from the route table etc.. etc.. The
>>> application will crash and come back up real quick, nothing needs to
>>> change in that meantime.
>
>
> Maybe a stupid question; why not fixing your application so that it doesn't
> crash, instead of adding adhoc patches?
>
> marc
>
>
>>>
>>> Any way to achieve that ? I just want to keep the KNI around even if
>>> my app vanishes.
>>>
>>> Rgds,
>>> Gopa.
>
>


More information about the dev mailing list