[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] kni: minor opto
Zhang, Helin
helin.zhang at intel.com
Tue Jun 16 03:15:36 CEST 2015
Hi Jay
From: Jay Rolette [mailto:rolette at infiniteio.com]
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 8:43 PM
To: Zhang, Helin
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] kni: minor opto
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Zhang, Helin <helin.zhang at intel.com<mailto:helin.zhang at intel.com>> wrote:
Would it be better to modify the similar thing in kni_ioctl_create()?
That one doesn't need to use the "safe" version of list_for_each_entry() either, but it isn't in the packet processing path so the minor performance improvement doesn't really matter.
Yes, your patches are OK for me. I have acked it.
- Helin
- Helin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org<mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org>] On Behalf Of Jay Rolette
> Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2015 3:19 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org<mailto:dev at dpdk.org>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] kni: minor opto
>
> Don't need the 'safe' version of list_for_each_entry() if you aren't deleting from
> the list as you iterate over it
>
> Signed-off-by: Jay Rolette <rolette at infiniteio.com<mailto:rolette at infiniteio.com>>
> ---
> lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/kni/kni_misc.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/kni/kni_misc.c
> b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/kni/kni_misc.c
> index 1935d32..312f196 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/kni/kni_misc.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/kni/kni_misc.c
> @@ -213,13 +213,12 @@ static int
> kni_thread_single(void *unused)
> {
> int j;
> - struct kni_dev *dev, *n;
> + struct kni_dev *dev;
>
> while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
> down_read(&kni_list_lock);
> for (j = 0; j < KNI_RX_LOOP_NUM; j++) {
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, n,
> - &kni_list_head, list) {
> + list_for_each_entry(dev, &kni_list_head, list) {
> #ifdef RTE_KNI_VHOST
> kni_chk_vhost_rx(dev);
> #else
> --
> 2.3.2 (Apple Git-55)
More information about the dev
mailing list