[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones

[Xu, HuilongX]

Hi Olivier,
Today I find a compile error, when I test ip fragment on dpdk.org. would you check this?  thanks a lot.
My dpdk.org commit: a6d71fa7146cc04320c2485d6dde44c1d888d652
The compile error as below:
CC main.o
/root/dpdk/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c: In function 'init_mem':
/root/dpdk/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c:748:8: error: 'MBUF_DATA_SIZE' undeclared (first use in this function)
     0, MBUF_DATA_SIZE, socket);
        ^
/root/dpdk/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c:748:8: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in


Best regards

huilong

-----Original Message-----
From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zoltan Kiss
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 6:39 PM
To: Ananyev, Konstantin; Olivier Matz; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones

Hi,

On 22/04/15 12:59, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 10:57 AM
>> To: dev at dpdk.org
>> Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin; zoltan.kiss at linaro.org; Richardson, Bruce; nhorman at tuxdriver.com; olivier.matz at 6wind.com
>> Subject: [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones
>>
>> The first objective of this series is to fix the support of indirect
>> mbufs when the application reserves a private area in mbufs. It also
>> removes the limitation that rte_pktmbuf_clone() is only allowed on
>> direct (non-cloned) mbufs. The series also contains some enhancements
>> and fixes in the mbuf area that makes the implementation of the
>> last patches easier.
>>
>
> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>

When does this series get merged?

Regards,

Zoltan