[dpdk-dev] Segmentation fault when bonding ports on Mellanox ConnectX-3

Jesper Wramberg jesper.wramberg at gmail.com
Thu Oct 8 20:19:11 CEST 2015


Hi Olga,

Thank you for your help. I'll check out the patches tomorrow.
For the sake of clarity, I assume you mean the patches about:
"eal: new interrupt handler type"
"mlx4: handle interrupts"
etc.

Regards,
Jesper


2015-10-08 17:36 GMT+02:00 Olga Shern <olgas at mellanox.com>:

>
>
> Hi Jesper,
>
> Bonding pmd is not supported with dpdk 2.1 on Mellanox nic
> We just sent patches to support async link events. Without these patches
> it will  not work.
>
> Best Regards
> Olga
> Sent from Samsung Mobile.
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Jesper Wramberg
> Date:08/10/2015 4:25 PM (GMT+00:00)
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] Segmentation fault when bonding ports on Mellanox
> ConnectX-3
>
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if anyone has any experience with the ConnectX-3 card from
> Mellanox ? I have a server with such a card I can't seem to get link
> bonding to work.
>
> I've installed the necessary kernel modules, etc. and the card works as
> expected when testing it using e.g. the layer 2 forwarding example. If i
> try to run the bond example, however, I get a segmentation fault when the
> "rte_eth_bond_slave_add" function is called. Originally I wanted to bond
> the ports using the EAL cmd line option but the card only has one pci
> address :(
>
> Does anyone have any idea what could be causing this behavior ?
> I am running fw version 2.30.x which I have considered upgrading. Besides
> this I have been wondering if I have to do anything in Linux since the PMD
> uses the Linux drivers for control. I haven't been able to find any
> information on it though.
>
> Regards,
> Jesper Wramberg
>


More information about the dev mailing list