[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] doc: modify release notes and deprecation notice for table and pipeline

[Azarewicz, PiotrX T]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 10:23 AM
> To: Azarewicz, PiotrX T
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] doc: modify release notes and
> deprecation notice for table and pipeline
> 
> 2015-10-12 07:53, Azarewicz, PiotrX T:
> > Hi Thomas,
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> > > Hi Maciej,
> > >
> > > 2015-09-11 12:31, Maciej Gajdzica:
> > > > --- a/lib/librte_pipeline/rte_pipeline_version.map
> > > > +++ b/lib/librte_pipeline/rte_pipeline_version.map
> > > > @@ -29,3 +29,11 @@ DPDK_2.1 {
> > > >  	rte_pipeline_table_stats_read;
> > > >
> > > >  } DPDK_2.0;
> > > > +
> > > > +DPDK_2.2 {
> > > > +	global:
> > > > +
> > > > +	rte_pipeline_table_entry_add_bulk;
> > > > +	rte_pipeline_table_entry_delete_bulk;
> > > > +
> > > > +} DPDK_2.1;
> > >
> > > The previous block was DPDK_2.0 for this library.
> > > So I think you should inherit from it, not DPDK_2.1 which doesn't
> > > exist in this context.
> >
> > The previous block was DPDK_2.1 :
> >
> > DPDK_2.1 {
> > 	global:
> >
> > 	rte_pipeline_port_in_stats_read;
> > 	rte_pipeline_port_out_stats_read;
> > 	rte_pipeline_table_stats_read;
> >
> > } DPDK_2.0;
> >
> > So I think this patch is okay.
> > Correct me if I am wrong with my understanding, please.
> 
> You are perfectly right.
> Sorry for the confusion.

No problem, thank for the answer.
Piotr