[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: VF RSS reta query and update

Lu, Wenzhuo wenzhuo.lu at intel.com
Fri Oct 16 03:21:44 CEST 2015


Hi Konstantin,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 6:58 AM
> To: Lu, Wenzhuo; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: VF RSS reta query and update
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wenzhuo Lu
> > Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 8:53 AM
> > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: VF RSS reta query and update
> >
> > This patch implements the VF RSS redirection table query and update
> > function on 10G NICs. But the update function is only provided for
> > x550. Because the other NICs don't have the separate registers for VF,
> > we don't want to let a VF NIC change the shared RSS reta registers. It may
> cause PF and other VF NICs'
> > behavior change without being noticed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 103
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 103 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > index 5e50ee6..44baadf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > @@ -326,6 +326,13 @@ static int
> > ixgbe_timesync_read_rx_timestamp(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,  static int
> ixgbe_timesync_read_tx_timestamp(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> >  					    struct timespec *timestamp);
> >
> > +static int ixgbevf_dev_rss_reta_update(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > +				struct rte_eth_rss_reta_entry64 *reta_conf,
> > +				uint16_t reta_size);
> > +static int ixgbevf_dev_rss_reta_query(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > +				struct rte_eth_rss_reta_entry64 *reta_conf,
> > +				uint16_t reta_size);
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Define VF Stats MACRO for Non "cleared on read" register
> >   */
> > @@ -497,6 +504,8 @@ static const struct eth_dev_ops ixgbevf_eth_dev_ops
> = {
> >  	.mac_addr_set         = ixgbevf_set_default_mac_addr,
> >  	.get_reg_length       = ixgbevf_get_reg_length,
> >  	.get_reg              = ixgbevf_get_regs,
> > +	.reta_update          = ixgbevf_dev_rss_reta_update,
> > +	.reta_query           = ixgbevf_dev_rss_reta_query,
> >  	.rss_hash_update      = ixgbevf_dev_rss_hash_update,
> >  	.rss_hash_conf_get    = ixgbevf_dev_rss_hash_conf_get,
> >  };
> > @@ -5557,6 +5566,100 @@ ixgbe_set_eeprom(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> >  	return eeprom->ops.write_buffer(hw,  first, length, data);  }
> >
> > +static int
> > +ixgbevf_dev_rss_reta_update(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > +			struct rte_eth_rss_reta_entry64 *reta_conf,
> > +			uint16_t reta_size)
> > +{
> > +	struct ixgbe_hw *hw = IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data-
> >dev_private);
> > +	uint32_t reta, r;
> > +	uint16_t i, j;
> > +	uint16_t idx, shift;
> > +	uint8_t mask;
> > +
> > +	if (hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_X550_vf &&
> > +		hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_X550EM_x_vf) {
> > +		PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "RSS reta update is not supported on this "
> > +			"VF NIC.");
> > +		return -ENOTSUP;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (reta_size != ETH_RSS_RETA_SIZE_64) {
> > +		PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "The size of hash lookup table configured
> "
> > +			"(%d) doesn't match the number of hardware can "
> > +			"support (%d)\n", reta_size, ETH_RSS_RETA_SIZE_64);
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < reta_size; i += IXGBE_4_BIT_WIDTH) {
> > +		idx = i / RTE_RETA_GROUP_SIZE;
> > +		shift = i % RTE_RETA_GROUP_SIZE;
> > +		mask = (uint8_t)((reta_conf[idx].mask >> shift) &
> > +				IXGBE_4_BIT_WIDTH);
> > +		if (!mask)
> > +			continue;
> > +		if (mask == IXGBE_4_BIT_WIDTH)
> > +			r = 0;
> > +		else
> > +			r = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_VFRETA(i >> 2));
> > +
> > +		for (j = 0, reta = 0; j < IXGBE_4_BIT_WIDTH; j++) {
> > +			if (mask & (0x1 << j))
> > +				reta |= reta_conf[idx].reta[shift + j] <<
> > +					(CHAR_BIT * j);
> > +			else
> > +				reta |= r &
> > +					(IXGBE_8_BIT_MASK << (CHAR_BIT * j));
> > +		}
> > +		IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_VFRETA(i >> 2), reta);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int
> > +ixgbevf_dev_rss_reta_query(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > +			struct rte_eth_rss_reta_entry64 *reta_conf,
> > +			uint16_t reta_size)
> > +{
> > +	struct ixgbe_hw *hw = IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data-
> >dev_private);
> > +	uint32_t reta;
> > +	uint16_t i, j;
> > +	uint16_t idx, shift;
> > +	uint8_t mask;
> > +
> > +	if (hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_X550_vf &&
> > +		hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_X550EM_x_vf) {
> > +		return ixgbe_dev_rss_reta_query(dev, reta_conf, reta_size);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (reta_size != ETH_RSS_RETA_SIZE_64) {
> > +		PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "The size of hash lookup table configured
> "
> > +			"(%d) doesn't match the number of hardware can "
> > +			"support (%d)\n", reta_size, ETH_RSS_RETA_SIZE_64);
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < reta_size; i += IXGBE_4_BIT_WIDTH) {
> > +		idx = i / RTE_RETA_GROUP_SIZE;
> > +		shift = i % RTE_RETA_GROUP_SIZE;
> > +		mask = (uint8_t)((reta_conf[idx].mask >> shift) &
> > +					IXGBE_4_BIT_MASK);
> > +		if (!mask)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		reta = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_VFRETA(i >> 2));
> > +		for (j = 0; j < IXGBE_4_BIT_WIDTH; j++) {
> > +			if (mask & (0x1 << j))
> > +				reta_conf[idx].reta[shift + j] =
> > +					((reta >> (CHAR_BIT * j)) &
> > +						IXGBE_8_BIT_MASK);
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> 
> Same as for other 3 patches in that series: >90% of the code is just copy & paste
> of existing one, with different HW registers name and reta_size.
> Pls unify.
> Konstantin
Thanks. I'll try to condense the code. And the same for the other 3 patches.

> 
> >  static struct rte_driver rte_ixgbe_driver = {
> >  	.type = PMD_PDEV,
> >  	.init = rte_ixgbe_pmd_init,
> > --
> > 1.9.3



More information about the dev mailing list