[dpdk-dev] DPDK patch backlog

[Qiu, Michael]

On 2015/10/21 17:05, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-10-21 11:48, Panu Matilainen:
>> On 10/21/2015 11:25 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> 2015-10-20 21:34, Stephen Hemminger:
>>>> Patch backlog is not getting better, now at 486.
>>>>
>>>> How can we break this logjam?
>>>> Do I need to make a new "ready for merge" tree?
>>> What would mean "ready for merge"?
>>> A lot of patches are acked but do not compile or doc is missing.
>> Well, isn't that one quite reasonable definition of being "ready"?
>> - patch must be acked
>> - patch must apply and compile (when relevant)
>> - is appropriately documented (commit message style and all)
> Yes.
> Compilation must be tested with GCC and clang, as static and shared libraries
> and for 32-bit and 64-bit targets.
> Documented means good commit message and doc or release notes updated.

What about bug fix patches?

Thanks,
Michael
>