[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: use zeroed memory for simple TX header

Rich Lane rich.lane at bigswitch.com
Tue Apr 5 00:57:11 CEST 2016


On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 03:13:37PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > Huawei, Yuanhan, any comment?
> >
> > 2016-03-31 13:01, Rich Lane:
> > >                             vq->vq_ring.desc[i + mid_idx].next = i;
> > >                             vq->vq_ring.desc[i + mid_idx].addr =
> > > -                                   vq->virtio_net_hdr_mem +
> > > -                                           i * vq->hw->vtnet_hdr_size;
> > > +                                   vq->virtio_net_hdr_mem;
>
> I could be wrong, but this looks like a special case when i == 0,
> which is by no way that zeroed memory is guaranteed? Huawei, do
> you have time to check this patch?


This bug exists because the type of the objects pointed to by
virtio_net_hdr_mem changed in 6dc5de3a (virtio: use indirect ring
elements), but because it isn't a C pointer the compiler didn't catch the
type mismatch. We could also fix it with:

    vq->virtio_net_hdr_mem + i * sizeof(struct virtio_tx_region) +
offsetof(struct virtio_tx_region, tx_hdr)

Given that tx_hdr is the first member in struct virtio_tx_region, and using
a single header optimizes cache use, that simplifies to the code in my
patch. The virtio-net header is never written to by simple TX so it remains
zeroed.

I can respin the patch using offsetof if that's preferred.

Note that right now virtio simple TX is broken with DPDK vhost due to the
flood of error messages.


More information about the dev mailing list