[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 24/29] net/ixgbe/base: add EEE support for DNL-controlled PHYs

[Ferruh Yigit]

On 12/4/2016 6:31 AM, Wei Dai wrote:
> This patch adds EEE support for DNL-controlled PHYs. Because DNL

What is DNL?

> does not indicate EEE capability or status, this patch simply
> assumes that it is supported. As soon as there is a DNL-supported
> PHY that does not support EEE, there will be defects in this area
> because the driver will not report the EEE status correctly.
> This also deletes some now-unused definitions from an earlier
> Marvell PHY implementation and combines a device ID check into a
> switch statement.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Dai <wei.dai at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_type.h |  8 --------
>  drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_x550.c | 15 +++++++--------
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_type.h b/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_type.h
> index 9ec17a9..f1761a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_type.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_type.h
> @@ -3720,14 +3720,6 @@ enum ixgbe_fc_mode {
>  	ixgbe_fc_default
>  };
>  
> -/* Master/slave control */
> -enum ixgbe_ms_type {
> -	ixgbe_ms_hw_default = 0,
> -	ixgbe_ms_force_master,
> -	ixgbe_ms_force_slave,
> -	ixgbe_ms_auto
> -};
> -

This seems not related to this patchset, also patch 15/29 has [1] again
seems unrelated to that patch, does it make sense to make these a
separate patch?

[1]
"
@@ -4046,8 +4112,8 @@ struct ixgbe_phy_info {
 	bool reset_disable;
 	ixgbe_autoneg_advertised autoneg_advertised;
 	ixgbe_link_speed speeds_supported;
-	enum ixgbe_ms_type ms_type;
-	enum ixgbe_ms_type original_ms_type;