[dpdk-dev] thoughts on DPDK after a few days of reading sources

[Dave Neary]

Hi,

On 02/11/2016 02:58 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-02-10 19:05, Seth Arnold:
> [...]
>>   It's nearly impossible to solve issues without error reporting. Good
>>   error reporting saves admins time and money.
> 
> Until now, the errors were reported on the list and most often fixed quickly.
> While I agree we need a more formal process (a bug tracker), I think we must
> be noticed of new bugs on the mailing list.
> Since nobody was against the bugzilla proposal, a deployment will be planned.
> 	http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-August/023012.html

I may have misunderstood Seth's comment, but it looked like he was
talking about checking errno after fopen and reporting the error with
perror or strerror in the event of a non-zero return.

Seth, did I understand correctly?

Thanks,
Dave.

-- 
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338