[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] crypto: normalize cryptodev pmd names with macros

[Mcnamara, John]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com]
> Sent: Saturday, July 9, 2016 2:34 PM
> To: Mcnamara, John <john.mcnamara at intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> <pablo.de.lara.guarch at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org; Richardson, Bruce
> <bruce.richardson at intel.com>; Stephen Hemminger
> <stephen at networkplumber.org>; Panu Matilainen <pmatilai at redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] crypto: normalize cryptodev pmd names with
> macros
> 
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 07:03:10PM +0000, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Neil Horman
> > > Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 2:42 PM
> > > To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com>
> > > Cc: De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch at intel.com>;
> > > dev at dpdk.org; Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson at intel.com>;
> > > Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>; Panu Matilainen
> > > <pmatilai at redhat.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] crypto: normalize cryptodev pmd
> > > names with macros
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 02:40:01PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > 2016-07-08 08:17, Neil Horman:
> > > > > I suppose thats fine, sure, though I'm really not comfortable
> > > > > with an open source project requiring what appears to be
> > > > > non-open source components (though I can't really tell what the
> > > > > snow3g or kasumi
> > > license is).
> > > >
> > > > Yes you're right.
> > > > IMHO, it is acceptable because it is free (just need a
> > > > registration) but it can be discussed.
> > > > I think there are some legal export issues because of crypto aim.
> > > Yeah, crypto usually has munitions export restrictions.  I'm fine
> > > with that, as long as the license to the code is GPL.  And I can't
> > > tell what the license is because you have to register to get it
> > > before you can see it.
> > >
> > > If you, or someone can confirm that the snow3g and kasumi ssl
> > > libraries are open source compatible (or better still if the license
> > > can be announced prior to registration on the web site), then I'm
> > > fine with it, and am happy to test with it, I just don't want to
> > > register without knowing that beforehand.
> >
> > Hi Neil,
> >
> > The license is "Intel Pre-Release Software License Agreement". We will
> > send a patch to make this this clear in the documentation. We will
> > also see if it can be made visible on the download page.
> >
> > I can send you a copy of the license if you wish. Pablo has already
> > tested compilation with the latest version of the patch.
> >
> I understand and appreciate that, but I'd still like to have a copy of the
> license.  It seems a bit unreasonable to me to include open source drivers
> in an open source project, if they can't be built without a non-open
> source library included.

I'll send you a copy.

John