[dpdk-dev] [RFC] Yet another option for DPDK options
keith.wiles at intel.com
Thu Jun 2 21:33:46 CEST 2016
On 6/2/16, 12:11 PM, "Neil Horman" <nhorman at tuxdriver.com> wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 01:53:32PM +0000, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>> On 6/2/16, 8:19 AM, "Thomas Monjalon" <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com> wrote:
>> >2016-06-02 06:41, Neil Horman:
>> >> I'm not sure why you're focusing no selecting a config file format at all. Why
>> The reason is I am on now looking at formats is because I have been thinking about this issue for some time and already understand your comments. I agree with you and Thomas, which to me would be the details needing to be done as part of the project. I guess I found the config file format a lot more fun to define. ☺
>Sure, it is more fun to define, but I think its likely the wrong problem to
>solve (or perhaps not even the wrong problem, but rather the less pressing
It is not the wrong problem, just a different starting point in the overall problem from the changes below. Now, I believe we have come full circle to identify the whole problem.
Let me look at the problem some and see if I can identify a configuration structure.
More information about the dev