[dpdk-dev] RFC: DPDK Long Term Support
john.mcnamara at intel.com
Tue Jun 7 14:53:02 CEST 2016
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Hall [mailto:mhall at mhcomputing.net]
> Sent: Friday, June 3, 2016 7:17 PM
> To: Mcnamara, John <john.mcnamara at intel.com>
> Cc: dev <dev at dpdk.org>; Christian Ehrhardt
> <christian.ehrhardt at canonical.com>; Markos Chandras <mchandras at suse.de>;
> Panu Matilainen <pmatilai at redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] RFC: DPDK Long Term Support
> > What changes should not be backported
> > -------------------------------------
> > * API or ABI breaking changes.
> I think this part needs some adjusting.
> It seems like there should be allowance for bug fixes where the original
> does break ABI but it is possible to make a version that doesn't.
> A lot of DPDK bug fixes I see would fall into this category and it isn't
Agreed, we should allow fix to be backported even if the patch itself cannot be, for ABI reasons.
More information about the dev