[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] testpmd: fix build on FreeBSD

Liu, Yong yong.liu at intel.com
Tue Mar 22 04:30:05 CET 2016


Hi Pablo & Sergio,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 5:40 PM
> To: Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio; Liu, Yong; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] testpmd: fix build on FreeBSD
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Sergio Gonzalez
> > Monroy
> > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 9:13 AM
> > To: Liu, Yong; dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] testpmd: fix build on FreeBSD
> >
> > On 21/03/2016 01:44, Marvin Liu wrote:
> > > Build log:
> > > /root/dpdk/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c:6687:45: error: no member named
> > > 's6_addr32' in 'struct in6_addr'
> > > 	rte_be_to_cpu_32(res->ip_value.addr.ipv6.s6_addr32[i]);
> > >
> > > This is caused by macro "s6_addr32" not defined on FreeBSD.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Marvin Liu <yong.liu at intel.com>
> > >
> > > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> > > index 9d52b8c..51ad23b 100644
> > > --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> > > +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> > > @@ -6684,7 +6684,11 @@ cmd_tunnel_filter_parsed(void *parsed_result,
> > >   		int i;
> > >   		for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
> > >   			tunnel_filter_conf.ip_addr.ipv6_addr[i] =
> > > +#ifdef RTE_EXEC_ENV_BSDAPP
> > > +			rte_be_to_cpu_32(res-
> > >ip_value.addr.ipv6.__u6_addr.__u6_addr32[i]);
> > > +#else
> > >   			rte_be_to_cpu_32(res-
> > >ip_value.addr.ipv6.s6_addr32[i]);
> > > +#endif
> >
> > Why not always use .__u6_addr.__u6_addr32[i] and avoid ifdef?
> >
Because of structures between BSD an Linux have different names. 
On linux, it will be "__in6_u. __u6_addr32". 

> > Sergio
> >
> > >   		}
> > >   		tunnel_filter_conf.ip_type = RTE_TUNNEL_IPTYPE_IPV6;
> > >   	}
> 
> Also, can you include the missing "Fixes" line?
> 
Sure, I will add it and send out v2.

> Thanks,
> Pablo

Best regards,
Marvin



More information about the dev mailing list