[dpdk-dev] is ixgbe supporting multi-segment mbuf?
Clearasu
clearasu at gmail.com
Tue Mar 29 03:37:53 CEST 2016
Hi Wenzhuo,
Thanks. For some reason, we have to stick to dpdk 2.0 for now. Is multi-segment mbuf supported in this version (any known issue with multi-seg in this version?) or do we have to upgrade to latest dpdk version for multi-segment support?
Clarylin
> On Mar 28, 2016, at 6:10 PM, Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu at intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Clarylin,
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Clarylin L
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 4:24 AM
>> To: dev at dpdk.org
>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] is ixgbe supporting multi-segment mbuf?
>>
>> ixgbe_recv_scattered_pkts was set to be the rx function. Receiving packets
> I see this function is already deprecated. Do you use an old version? Would you like to try the newest code?
>
>> smaller than mbuf size works perfectly. However, if an incoming packet is
>> greater than the maximum acceptable length of one “mbuf” data size, receiving
>> does not work. In this case, isn't it supposed to use mbuf chaining to receive?
>>
>> The port has both jumbo_frame and enable_scatter being on. are these two
>> flags good enough to make mbuf chaining going?
More information about the dev
mailing list