[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: split virtio rx/tx queue
Yuanhan Liu
yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com
Fri May 27 11:07:56 CEST 2016
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 09:38:32PM +0800, Huawei Xie wrote:
> vq->vq_ring_mem = mz->phys_addr;
> vq->vq_ring_virt_mem = mz->addr;
> - PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "vq->vq_ring_mem: 0x%"PRIx64, (uint64_t)mz->phys_addr);
> - PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "vq->vq_ring_virt_mem: 0x%"PRIx64, (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)mz->addr);
> - vq->virtio_net_hdr_mz = NULL;
> - vq->virtio_net_hdr_mem = 0;
> + PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "vq->vq_ring_mem: 0x%"PRIx64,
> + (uint64_t)mz->phys_addr);
> + PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "vq->vq_ring_virt_mem: 0x%"PRIx64,
> + (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)mz->addr);
> +
> + hdr_mz = rte_memzone_reserve_aligned(vq_hdr_name, sz_hdr_mz, socket_id,
> + 0, RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
We don't need allocate hdr_mz for Rx queue, and in such case, sz_hdr_mz
is 0. I'm wondering what hdr_mz would be then, NULL?
Anyway, you should skip the hdr_mz allocation for Rx queue, and I also
would suggest you to move the vq_hdr_name setup here.
> + if (hdr_mz == NULL) {
> + if (rte_errno == EEXIST)
> + hdr_mz = rte_memzone_lookup(vq_hdr_name);
> + if (hdr_mz == NULL) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto fail_q_alloc;
> + }
> + }
>
...
>
> PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
> ret = virtio_dev_queue_setup(dev, VTNET_CQ, VTNET_SQ_CQ_QUEUE_IDX,
> - vtpci_queue_idx, 0, socket_id, &vq);
> + vtpci_queue_idx, 0, socket_id, (void **)&cvq);
Unnecessary cast. Note that there are few others like that in this
patch.
> - PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "dequeue:%d", num);
> - PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "packet len:%d", len[0]);
> + PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "dequeue:%d\n", num);
> + PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "packet len:%d\n", len[0]);
We should not append "\n" for PMD_RX_LOG; this macro alreadys does it.
Another note is that you might want to run checkpatch; I saw quite many
warnings.
--yliu
More information about the dev
mailing list