[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: not handle vlan slow packet
Ferruh Yigit
ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Tue Nov 1 11:46:39 CET 2016
Hi Haifeng,
On 10/31/2016 3:52 AM, linhaifeng wrote:
> From: Haifeng Lin <haifeng.lin at huawei.com>
>
> if rx vlan offload is enable we should not handle vlan slow
> packets too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haifeng Lin <haifeng.lin at huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
> index 09ce7bf..ca17898 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
> @@ -169,7 +169,8 @@ bond_ethdev_rx_burst_8023ad(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs,
> /* Remove packet from array if it is slow packet or slave is not
> * in collecting state or bondign interface is not in promiscus
> * mode and packet address does not match. */
> - if (unlikely(hdr->ether_type == ether_type_slow_be ||
> + if (unlikely((hdr->ether_type == ether_type_slow_be &&
> + !bufs[j]->vlan_tci) ||
> !collecting || (!promisc &&
> !is_multicast_ether_addr(&hdr->d_addr) &&
> !is_same_ether_addr(&bond_mac, &hdr->d_addr)))) {
>
There are a few version of this patch, I guess this one is the correct
one, can you please confirm?
Also this one supersede following one, right?
http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/16840/
It helps a lot if you use versioning in the patches [PATCH -vN] and add
a description of changes in commit log (after "---") between patch versions.
Thanks,
ferruh
More information about the dev
mailing list