[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 00/24] Introducing rte_driver/rte_device generalization

[Thomas Monjalon]

Applied, thanks everybody for the great (re)work!

2016-09-20 18:11, Shreyansh Jain:
> Future Work/Pending:
> ===================
>  - Presently eth_driver, rte_eth_dev are not aligned to the rte_driver/
>    rte_device model. eth_driver still is a PCI specific entity. This
>    has been highlighted by comments from Ferruh in [9].
>  - Some variables, like drv_name (as highlighted by Ferruh), are getting
>    duplicated across rte_xxx_driver/device and rte_driver/device.

What about those pending work?

I would add more remaining issues:
- probe/remove naming could be applied to vdev for consistency
- rte_eal_device_insert must be called in vdev
- REGISTER macros should be prefixed with RTE_
- Some functions in EAL does not need eal_ in their prefix:
	rte_eal_pci_   -> rte_pci_
	rte_eal_dev_   -> rte_dev_
	rte_eal_vdev_  -> rte_vdev_
	rte_eal_driver -> rte_drv_
	rte_eal_vdrv   -> rte_vdrv_