[dpdk-dev] Project Governance and Linux Foundation

Thomas Monjalon thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com
Tue Oct 18 15:27:27 CEST 2016


2016-10-18 17:04, Jerin Jacob:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:23:42PM -0400, Dave Neary wrote:
> > > I still hear concerns on this, and based on discussions with others who put their names to the post below, they do too. I think it's a perception that we need to address.
> > 
> > I would say that there is still a perception issue, for companies who
> > look at the active developers, the owners of the project's resources
> > (infra, domain name), and who have heard anecdotal evidence of issues in
> > the past. I think the project has made a lot of progress since I have
> > been following it, and I do not believe there are any major issues with
> > the independence of the project. However, there are still concerned
> > parties on this front, and the concerns can be easily addressed by a
> > move to the LF.
> 
> +1

How can we solve issues if you don't give more details than
"hear concerns" or "heard anecdotal evidence of issues"?


More information about the dev mailing list