[dpdk-dev] Manual link speed/duplex configuration not working with DPDK
Lu, Wenzhuo
wenzhuo.lu at intel.com
Mon Oct 24 02:54:27 CEST 2016
Hi Ananda,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ananda
> Sathyanarayana
> Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2016 3:27 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: ananda at versa-networks.com; Vignesh Chinnakkannu
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] Manual link speed/duplex configuration not working with
> DPDK
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> While testing manual link speed/duplex configuration with DPDK 1.7.1, I
> observed the same issues mentioned by the below post
>
> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-January/010834.html. I see the same
> issue with 16.04 as well.
Don’t know the history. Seems it’s discussion but not a patch. Guess that's why it’s not accepted.
It looks OK to me. Maybe we can create a patch for it?
>
>
>
> Looks like the above patch is not accepted by the DPDK community yet. Any
> specific reason ?
>
>
>
> From the code, it looks like, hw->mac.autoneg, variable is used to switch
> between calling either autoneg function or forcing speed/duplex function.
> But this variable is not modified in eth_em_start/eth_igb_start routines (it is
> always set to 1) while forcing the link.
>
>
>
> s32 e1000_setup_copper_link_generic(struct e1000_hw *hw)
>
> {
>
> s32 ret_val;
>
> bool link;
>
>
>
> DEBUGFUNC("e1000_setup_copper_link_generic");
>
>
>
> if (hw->mac.autoneg) { <<<<<<<<<<<< always set, is not modified
> in eth_em_start/eth_igb_start
>
>
>
> /* Setup autoneg and flow control advertisement and perform
>
> * autonegotiation.
>
> */
>
> ret_val = e1000_copper_link_autoneg(hw);
>
> if (ret_val)
>
> return ret_val;
>
> } else {
>
> /* PHY will be set to 10H, 10F, 100H or 100F
>
> * depending on user settings.
>
> */
>
> DEBUGOUT("Forcing Speed and Duplex\n");
>
> ret_val = hw->phy.ops.force_speed_duplex(hw);
> <<<<<<<<<<<< Not called at all
>
> if (ret_val) {
>
> DEBUGOUT("Error Forcing Speed and Duplex\n");
>
> return ret_val;
>
> }
>
> }
>
>
>
> }
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ananda
More information about the dev
mailing list