[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: read and parse device option separately

Gaëtan Rivet gaetan.rivet at 6wind.com
Wed Aug 2 17:23:17 CEST 2017


On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 04:29:13PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi Gaetan
> 
> 02/08/2017 10:56, Gaetan Rivet:
> > When the EAL parses the common options given to the application,
> > not all subsystems are available. Some device drivers are registered
> > afterward upon dynamic plugin loading.
> > 
> > Devices using those drivers are thus unable to be parsed by any drivers
> > and are rejected.
> > 
> > Store the device options first and keep them for later processing.
> > Parse these right before initializing the buses, the drivers must have
> > been stabilized at this point.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Gaetan Rivet <gaetan.rivet at 6wind.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > v2:
> > 
> >   - Fix the -w / -b incompatibility check.
> >     It was checking that no two incompatible rte_devargs were inserted.
> >     As rte_devargs are now generated right before buses scan, this check
> >     was always correct, even when it should have failed.
> 
> You are doing this check in eal_check_common_options().
> I think you can do the check earlier in eal_parse_common_option()
> with 2 static variables, instead of implementing the
> new function eal_option_device_type_count().
> 

Okay, will simplify.

> > +static unsigned int
> > +eal_option_device_type_count(enum rte_devtype type)
> [...]
> > @@ -944,14 +1013,14 @@ eal_parse_common_option(int opt, const char *optarg,
> >  	switch (opt) {
> >  	/* blacklist */
> >  	case 'b':
> > -		if (rte_eal_devargs_add(RTE_DEVTYPE_BLACKLISTED_PCI,
> > +		if (eal_option_device_add(RTE_DEVTYPE_BLACKLISTED_PCI,
> >  				optarg) < 0) {
> >  			return -1;
> >  		}
> >  		break;
> >  	/* whitelist */
> >  	case 'w':
> > -		if (rte_eal_devargs_add(RTE_DEVTYPE_WHITELISTED_PCI,
> > +		if (eal_option_device_add(RTE_DEVTYPE_WHITELISTED_PCI,
> >  				optarg) < 0) {
> >  			return -1;
> >  		}
> > @@ -1061,7 +1130,7 @@ eal_parse_common_option(int opt, const char *optarg,
> >  		break;
> >  
> >  	case OPT_VDEV_NUM:
> > -		if (rte_eal_devargs_add(RTE_DEVTYPE_VIRTUAL,
> > +		if (eal_option_device_add(RTE_DEVTYPE_VIRTUAL,
> >  				optarg) < 0) {
> >  			return -1;
> >  		}
> > @@ -1187,8 +1256,8 @@ eal_check_common_options(struct internal_config *internal_cfg)
> >  		return -1;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	if (rte_eal_devargs_type_count(RTE_DEVTYPE_WHITELISTED_PCI) != 0 &&
> > -		rte_eal_devargs_type_count(RTE_DEVTYPE_BLACKLISTED_PCI) != 0) {
> > +	if (eal_option_device_type_count(RTE_DEVTYPE_WHITELISTED_PCI) != 0 &&
> > +		eal_option_device_type_count(RTE_DEVTYPE_BLACKLISTED_PCI) != 0) {
> >  		RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Options blacklist (-b) and whitelist (-w) "
> >  			"cannot be used at the same time\n");
> >  		return -1;
> 
> [...]
> > +static int
> > +eal_option_device_add(enum rte_devtype type, const char *optarg)
> > +{
> > +	struct device_option *deo;
> > +	size_t optlen;
> 
> Just a last comment about variable name:
> Instead of deo, opt or option would be more meaningful.
> 

Will do.

> Thanks for the important fix!

-- 
Gaëtan Rivet
6WIND


More information about the dev mailing list