[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: eliminate duplicate filterlist symbols

Ferruh Yigit ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Tue Aug 29 18:23:23 CEST 2017


On 8/28/2017 6:13 PM, David Harton (dharton) wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yigit at intel.com]
>> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 9:27 AM
>> To: David Harton (dharton) <dharton at cisco.com>;
>> konstantin.ananyev at intel.com
>> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: eliminate duplicate filterlist
>> symbols
>>
>> On 8/25/2017 8:21 PM, David Harton wrote:
>>> Some compilers generate warnings for duplicate symbols for the set of
>>> filter lists current defined in ixgbe_ethdev.h.
>>> This commits moves the defintion and declaration to the source file
>>> that actually uses them and provides a function to initialize the
>>> values akin to its flush function.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Harton <dharton at cisco.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c |  8 ++------
>>> drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h |  7 +------
>>>  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c   | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>  3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
>>> b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
>>> index 1ec5aaf..ed21af5 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
>>> @@ -1332,12 +1332,8 @@ struct rte_ixgbe_xstats_name_off {
>>>  	/* initialize l2 tunnel filter list & hash */
>>>  	ixgbe_l2_tn_filter_init(eth_dev);
>>>
>>> -	TAILQ_INIT(&filter_ntuple_list);
>>> -	TAILQ_INIT(&filter_ethertype_list);
>>> -	TAILQ_INIT(&filter_syn_list);
>>> -	TAILQ_INIT(&filter_fdir_list);
>>> -	TAILQ_INIT(&filter_l2_tunnel_list);
>>> -	TAILQ_INIT(&ixgbe_flow_list);
>>> +	/* initialize flow filter lists */
>>> +	ixgbe_filterlist_init();
>>
>> Will it work if list initialization converted to the static
>> initialization? That would remove requirement of this function call.
> 
> I was trying to keep the behavior the same:
>   .probe -> eth_ixgbe_dev_init -> ixgbe_filterlist_init
>   .remove -> eth_ixgbe_dev_uninit -> ixgbe_filterlist_flush
> 
> While I think the below would work I always like mirror/parallel relationships like ctor/dtor for objects.

I would agree if ixgbe_filterlist_init() initializes something more than
list itself, but for this case initialization can be avoided completely
which I would prefer.

Driver maintainer also cc'ed for more comment.

> 
> Is that reasonable?
> 
> Thanks,
> Dave
> 
>>
>> something like:
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c
>> b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c index c8645f056..6184eb4af 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c
>> @@ -79,6 +79,24 @@
>>  #define IXGBE_MAX_N_TUPLE_PRIO 7
>>  #define IXGBE_MAX_FLX_SOURCE_OFF 62
>>
>> +static TAILQ_HEAD(ixgbe_ntuple_filter_list, ixgbe_ntuple_filter_ele)
>> +       filter_ntuple_list = TAILQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER(filter_ntuple_list);
>> +
>> +static TAILQ_HEAD(ixgbe_ethertype_filter_list,
>> ixgbe_ethertype_filter_ele)
>> +       filter_ethertype_list =
>> TAILQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER(filter_ethertype_list);
>> +
>> +static TAILQ_HEAD(ixgbe_syn_filter_list, ixgbe_eth_syn_filter_ele)
>> +       filter_syn_list = TAILQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER(filter_syn_list);
>> +
>> +static TAILQ_HEAD(ixgbe_fdir_rule_filter_list, ixgbe_fdir_rule_ele)
>> +       filter_fdir_list = TAILQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER(filter_fdir_list);
>> +
>> +static TAILQ_HEAD(ixgbe_l2_tunnel_filter_list,
>> ixgbe_eth_l2_tunnel_conf_ele)
>> +       filter_l2_tunnel_list =
>> TAILQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER(filter_l2_tunnel_list);
>> +
>> +static TAILQ_HEAD(ixgbe_flow_mem_list, ixgbe_flow_mem)
>> +       ixgbe_flow_list = TAILQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER(ixgbe_flow_list);
>> +



More information about the dev mailing list