[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] net/sfc: add support for Rx descriptor status API
Andrew Rybchenko
arybchenko at solarflare.com
Wed Aug 30 11:08:46 CEST 2017
From: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov at oktetlabs.ru>
Support for the feature is added to EFX Rx datapath
Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov at oktetlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko at solarflare.com>
---
doc/guides/nics/features/sfc_efx.ini | 1 +
drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_rx.h | 5 +++++
drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c | 9 +++++++++
drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c | 10 ++++++++++
drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 63 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/features/sfc_efx.ini b/doc/guides/nics/features/sfc_efx.ini
index 1db7f67..0a5c143 100644
--- a/doc/guides/nics/features/sfc_efx.ini
+++ b/doc/guides/nics/features/sfc_efx.ini
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ VLAN offload = P
L3 checksum offload = Y
L4 checksum offload = Y
Packet type parsing = Y
+Rx descriptor status = Y
Basic stats = Y
Extended stats = Y
FW version = Y
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_rx.h b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_rx.h
index a7b8278..3f6a604 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_rx.h
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_rx.h
@@ -155,6 +155,10 @@ typedef void (sfc_dp_rx_qstop_t)(struct sfc_dp_rxq *dp_rxq,
/** Get number of pending Rx descriptors */
typedef unsigned int (sfc_dp_rx_qdesc_npending_t)(struct sfc_dp_rxq *dp_rxq);
+/** Check Rx descriptor status */
+typedef int (sfc_dp_rx_qdesc_status_t)(struct sfc_dp_rxq *dp_rxq,
+ uint16_t offset);
+
/** Receive datapath definition */
struct sfc_dp_rx {
struct sfc_dp dp;
@@ -170,6 +174,7 @@ struct sfc_dp_rx {
sfc_dp_rx_qpurge_t *qpurge;
sfc_dp_rx_supported_ptypes_get_t *supported_ptypes_get;
sfc_dp_rx_qdesc_npending_t *qdesc_npending;
+ sfc_dp_rx_qdesc_status_t *qdesc_status;
eth_rx_burst_t pkt_burst;
};
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c
index 60812cb..500d652 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c
@@ -544,6 +544,14 @@ struct sfc_ef10_rxq {
return -ENOTSUP;
}
+static sfc_dp_rx_qdesc_status_t sfc_ef10_rx_qdesc_status;
+static int
+sfc_ef10_rx_qdesc_status(__rte_unused struct sfc_dp_rxq *dp_rxq,
+ __rte_unused uint16_t offset)
+{
+ return -ENOTSUP;
+}
+
static uint64_t
sfc_ef10_mk_mbuf_rearm_data(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t prefix_size)
@@ -708,5 +716,6 @@ struct sfc_dp_rx sfc_ef10_rx = {
.qpurge = sfc_ef10_rx_qpurge,
.supported_ptypes_get = sfc_ef10_supported_ptypes_get,
.qdesc_npending = sfc_ef10_rx_qdesc_npending,
+ .qdesc_status = sfc_ef10_rx_qdesc_status,
.pkt_burst = sfc_ef10_recv_pkts,
};
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c
index 12bcd6f..fe9ca30 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c
@@ -1087,6 +1087,15 @@
}
static int
+sfc_rx_descriptor_status(void *queue, uint16_t offset)
+{
+ struct sfc_dp_rxq *dp_rxq = queue;
+ struct sfc_rxq *rxq = sfc_rxq_by_dp_rxq(dp_rxq);
+
+ return rxq->evq->sa->dp_rx->qdesc_status(dp_rxq, offset);
+}
+
+static int
sfc_rx_queue_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t rx_queue_id)
{
struct sfc_adapter *sa = dev->data->dev_private;
@@ -1469,6 +1478,7 @@
.rx_queue_release = sfc_rx_queue_release,
.rx_queue_count = sfc_rx_queue_count,
.rx_descriptor_done = sfc_rx_descriptor_done,
+ .rx_descriptor_status = sfc_rx_descriptor_status,
.tx_queue_setup = sfc_tx_queue_setup,
.tx_queue_release = sfc_tx_queue_release,
.flow_ctrl_get = sfc_flow_ctrl_get,
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c
index 1bf8644..0ef7665 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c
@@ -349,6 +349,43 @@
return rxq->pending - rxq->completed;
}
+static sfc_dp_rx_qdesc_status_t sfc_efx_rx_qdesc_status;
+static int
+sfc_efx_rx_qdesc_status(struct sfc_dp_rxq *dp_rxq, uint16_t offset)
+{
+ struct sfc_efx_rxq *rxq = sfc_efx_rxq_by_dp_rxq(dp_rxq);
+
+ if (unlikely(offset > rxq->ptr_mask))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /*
+ * Poll EvQ to derive up-to-date 'rxq->pending' figure;
+ * it is required for the queue to be running, but the
+ * check is omitted because API design assumes that it
+ * is the duty of the caller to satisfy all conditions
+ */
+ SFC_ASSERT((rxq->flags & SFC_EFX_RXQ_FLAG_RUNNING) ==
+ SFC_EFX_RXQ_FLAG_RUNNING);
+ sfc_ev_qpoll(rxq->evq);
+
+ /*
+ * There is a handful of reserved entries in the ring,
+ * but an explicit check whether the offset points to
+ * a reserved entry is neglected since the two checks
+ * below rely on the figures which take the HW limits
+ * into account and thus if an entry is reserved, the
+ * checks will fail and UNAVAIL code will be returned
+ */
+
+ if (offset < (rxq->pending - rxq->completed))
+ return RTE_ETH_RX_DESC_DONE;
+
+ if (offset < (rxq->added - rxq->completed))
+ return RTE_ETH_RX_DESC_AVAIL;
+
+ return RTE_ETH_RX_DESC_UNAVAIL;
+}
+
struct sfc_rxq *
sfc_rxq_by_dp_rxq(const struct sfc_dp_rxq *dp_rxq)
{
@@ -498,6 +535,7 @@ struct sfc_dp_rx sfc_efx_rx = {
.qpurge = sfc_efx_rx_qpurge,
.supported_ptypes_get = sfc_efx_supported_ptypes_get,
.qdesc_npending = sfc_efx_rx_qdesc_npending,
+ .qdesc_status = sfc_efx_rx_qdesc_status,
.pkt_burst = sfc_efx_recv_pkts,
};
--
1.8.2.3
More information about the dev
mailing list