[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] app/testpmd: add configuration for udp port tunnel type
Ferruh Yigit
ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Thu Dec 7 01:38:34 CET 2017
On 11/24/2017 12:35 PM, Rasesh Mody wrote:
> From: Shahed Shaikh <shahed.shaikh at cavium.com>
>
> Replace rx_vxlan_port command with rx_tunnel_udp_port to support both VXLAN
> and GENEVE udp ports.
Also updates tunnel_filter command to accept "geneve" argument, can you please
separate to another patch.
And to prevent these patches hold PMD patches, you can send a new version of the
patchset splitting qede PMD patches into their own patchset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shahed Shaikh <shahed.shaikh at cavium.com>
> ---
> app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> index f71d963..4b5a8cd 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> @@ -402,11 +402,11 @@ static void cmd_help_long_parsed(void *parsed_result,
> "imac-tenid|imac|omac-imac-tenid|oip|iip) (tenant_id) (queue_id)\n"
> " remove a tunnel filter of a port.\n\n"
>
> - "rx_vxlan_port add (udp_port) (port_id)\n"
> - " Add an UDP port for VXLAN packet filter on a port\n\n"
> + "rx_tunnel_udp_port add vxlan|geneve (udp_port) (port_id)\n"
Not sure about "rx_tunnel_udp_port" command.
What do you think something like:
"port config (port_id) udp_tunnel_port add|rm vxlan|geneve (udp_port)"
to expand ""port config (port_id) ..." command instead of introducing a new one?
<...>
More information about the dev
mailing list