[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/6] eventdev: implement the northbound APIs

Nipun Gupta nipun.gupta at nxp.com
Thu Feb 2 12:19:45 CET 2017



> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jerin Jacob
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 14:55
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com; bruce.richardson at intel.com; Hemant
> Agrawal <hemant.agrawal at nxp.com>; gage.eads at intel.com;
> harry.van.haaren at intel.com; Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/6] eventdev: implement the northbound APIs
> 
> This patch implements northbound eventdev API interface using southbond
> driver interface
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com>
> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at intel.com>
> ---
>  config/common_base                           |   6 +
>  lib/Makefile                                 |   1 +
>  lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_log.h      |   1 +
>  lib/librte_eventdev/Makefile                 |  57 ++
>  lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.c           | 986
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h           | 106 ++-
>  lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_pmd.h       | 109 +++
>  lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_version.map |  33 +
>  mk/rte.app.mk                                |   1 +
>  9 files changed, 1294 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)  create mode 100644
> lib/librte_eventdev/Makefile  create mode 100644
> lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.c
>  create mode 100644 lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_version.map
> 

<Snip>

> +static inline int
> +rte_event_dev_port_config(struct rte_eventdev *dev, uint8_t nb_ports) {
> +	uint8_t old_nb_ports = dev->data->nb_ports;
> +	void **ports;
> +	uint16_t *links_map;
> +	uint8_t *ports_dequeue_depth;
> +	uint8_t *ports_enqueue_depth;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	RTE_EDEV_LOG_DEBUG("Setup %d ports on device %u", nb_ports,
> +			 dev->data->dev_id);
> +
> +	/* First time configuration */
> +	if (dev->data->ports == NULL && nb_ports != 0) {
> +		dev->data->ports = rte_zmalloc_socket("eventdev->data-
> >ports",
> +				sizeof(dev->data->ports[0]) * nb_ports,
> +				RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, dev->data->socket_id);
> +		if (dev->data->ports == NULL) {
> +			dev->data->nb_ports = 0;
> +			RTE_EDEV_LOG_ERR("failed to get mem for port meta
> data,"
> +					"nb_ports %u", nb_ports);
> +			return -(ENOMEM);
> +		}
> +
> +		/* Allocate memory to store ports dequeue depth */
> +		dev->data->ports_dequeue_depth =
> +			rte_zmalloc_socket("eventdev-
> >ports_dequeue_depth",
> +			sizeof(dev->data->ports_dequeue_depth[0]) *
> nb_ports,
> +			RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, dev->data->socket_id);
> +		if (dev->data->ports_dequeue_depth == NULL) {
> +			dev->data->nb_ports = 0;
> +			RTE_EDEV_LOG_ERR("failed to get mem for port deq
> meta,"
> +					"nb_ports %u", nb_ports);
> +			return -(ENOMEM);
> +		}
> +
> +		/* Allocate memory to store ports enqueue depth */
> +		dev->data->ports_enqueue_depth =
> +			rte_zmalloc_socket("eventdev-
> >ports_enqueue_depth",
> +			sizeof(dev->data->ports_enqueue_depth[0]) *
> nb_ports,
> +			RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, dev->data->socket_id);
> +		if (dev->data->ports_enqueue_depth == NULL) {
> +			dev->data->nb_ports = 0;
> +			RTE_EDEV_LOG_ERR("failed to get mem for port enq
> meta,"
> +					"nb_ports %u", nb_ports);
> +			return -(ENOMEM);
> +		}
> +
> +		/* Allocate memory to store queue to port link connection */
> +		dev->data->links_map =
> +			rte_zmalloc_socket("eventdev->links_map",
> +			sizeof(dev->data->links_map[0]) * nb_ports *
> +			RTE_EVENT_MAX_QUEUES_PER_DEV,
> +			RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, dev->data->socket_id);
> +		if (dev->data->links_map == NULL) {
> +			dev->data->nb_ports = 0;
> +			RTE_EDEV_LOG_ERR("failed to get mem for port_map
> area,"
> +					"nb_ports %u", nb_ports);
> +			return -(ENOMEM);
> +		}

I think we also need to set all the 'links map' to EVENT_QUEUE_SERVICE_PRIORITY_INVALID
on zmalloc.

> +	} else if (dev->data->ports != NULL && nb_ports != 0) {/* re-config */
> +		RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->dev_ops->port_release, -
> ENOTSUP);
> +
> +		ports = dev->data->ports;
> +		ports_dequeue_depth = dev->data->ports_dequeue_depth;
> +		ports_enqueue_depth = dev->data->ports_enqueue_depth;
> +		links_map = dev->data->links_map;
> +

<Snip>

> +int
> +rte_event_port_setup(uint8_t dev_id, uint8_t port_id,
> +		     const struct rte_event_port_conf *port_conf) {
> +	struct rte_eventdev *dev;
> +	struct rte_event_port_conf def_conf;
> +	int diag;
> +
> +	RTE_EVENTDEV_VALID_DEVID_OR_ERR_RET(dev_id, -EINVAL);
> +	dev = &rte_eventdevs[dev_id];
> +
> +	if (!is_valid_port(dev, port_id)) {
> +		RTE_EDEV_LOG_ERR("Invalid port_id=%" PRIu8, port_id);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Check new_event_threshold limit */
> +	if ((port_conf && !port_conf->new_event_threshold) ||
> +			(port_conf && port_conf->new_event_threshold >
> +				 dev->data->dev_conf.nb_events_limit)) {

As mentioned in 'rte_eventdev.h', the 'new_event_threshold' is valid for *closed systems*,
so is the above check valid for *open systems*?
Or is it implicit that for open systems the 'port_conf->new_event_threshold' should be
set to '-1' by the application just as it is for 'max_num_events' of 'struct rte_event_dev_info'.

> +		RTE_EDEV_LOG_ERR(
> +		   "dev%d port%d Invalid event_threshold=%d
> nb_events_limit=%d",
> +			dev_id, port_id, port_conf->new_event_threshold,
> +			dev->data->dev_conf.nb_events_limit);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +

<Snip>

Regards,
Nipun


More information about the dev mailing list