[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/5] ethdev: add firmware version get
Remy Horton
remy.horton at intel.com
Mon Jan 9 11:01:40 CET 2017
On 09/01/2017 07:16, Yang, Qiming wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org]
[..]
>> void
>> +rte_eth_dev_fw_version_get(uint8_t port_id, char *fw_version, int
>> +fw_length) {
>> + struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
>> +
>> + RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_RET(port_id);
>> + dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
>> +
>> + RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_RET(*dev->dev_ops->fw_version_get);
>> + (*dev->dev_ops->fw_version_get)(dev, fw_version, fw_length); }
>
> Maybe dev argument to fw_version_get should be:
> const struct rte_eth_dev *dev
> Qiming: do you means the argument to ops fw_version_get?
> why should add 'const'? both two are OK, but we usually use struct rte_eth_dev *dev.
Does seem a bit odd to me as I don't think any of the other rte_dev_ops
entrypoints use const. Maybe they should but if that's now policy (I've
been under a rock recently) probably better to do them all in a seperate
cleanup patchset..
More information about the dev
mailing list