[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] net/ixgbe: enable flex bytes for generic flow API
Zhang, Qi Z
qi.z.zhang at intel.com
Fri Jun 2 04:00:13 CEST 2017
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lu, Wenzhuo
> Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 9:49 AM
> To: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>; Zhang, Helin
> <helin.zhang at intel.com>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 3/3] net/ixgbe: enable flex bytes for generic flow API
>
> Hi Qi,
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Zhang, Qi Z
> > Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 3:46 AM
> > To: Lu, Wenzhuo; Zhang, Helin
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Zhang, Qi Z
> > Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] net/ixgbe: enable flex bytes for generic flow
> > API
> >
> > Add fdir flex byte support for rte_flow APIs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>
> > ---
> >
> > v2:
> > - fix couple checkpatch errors.
> >
> > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h | 3 +
> > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_fdir.c | 31 ++++++++-
> > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c | 137
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 3 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_fdir.c
> > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_fdir.c index 7f6c7b5..950f5ba 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_fdir.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_fdir.c
> > @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ fdir_set_input_mask_82599(struct rte_eth_dev
> *dev)
> > * mask VM pool and DIPv6 since there are currently not supported
> > * mask FLEX byte, it will be set in flex_conf
> > */
> > - uint32_t fdirm = IXGBE_FDIRM_POOL | IXGBE_FDIRM_DIPv6 |
> > IXGBE_FDIRM_FLEX;
> > + uint32_t fdirm = IXGBE_FDIRM_POOL | IXGBE_FDIRM_DIPv6;
> > uint32_t fdirtcpm; /* TCP source and destination port masks. */
> > uint32_t fdiripv6m; /* IPv6 source and destination masks. */
> > volatile uint32_t *reg;
> > @@ -333,6 +333,10 @@ fdir_set_input_mask_82599(struct rte_eth_dev
> *dev)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > + /* flex byte mask */
> > + if (info->mask.flex_bytes_mask == 0)
> > + fdirm |= IXGBE_FDIRM_FLEX;
> > +
> > IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_FDIRM, fdirm);
> Should the same change be done for x550?
>
Currently I didn't see it is necessary.
Because I saw fdir_set_input_mask_x550 will only be used for mac-vlan and tunneling filter
where flex byte is not considered in this patch. so keep it disabled
Please correct if I miss something.
More information about the dev
mailing list