[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 04/17] lib: add new burst oriented distributor structs

Hunt, David david.hunt at intel.com
Wed Mar 1 10:57:27 CET 2017



On 24/2/2017 2:08 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 03:17:40AM +0000, David Hunt wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: David Hunt <david.hunt at intel.com>
>> ---
>>   lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_private.h | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 61 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_private.h b/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_private.h
>> index 2d85b9b..c8e0f98 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_private.h
>> +++ b/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_private.h
>> @@ -129,6 +129,67 @@ struct rte_distributor_v20 {
>>   	struct rte_distributor_returned_pkts returns;
>>   };
>>   
>> +/* All different signature compare functions */
>> +enum rte_distributor_match_function {
>> +	RTE_DIST_MATCH_SCALAR = 0,
>> +	RTE_DIST_MATCH_VECTOR,
>> +	RTE_DIST_NUM_MATCH_FNS
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * Buffer structure used to pass the pointer data between cores. This is cache
>> + * line aligned, but to improve performance and prevent adjacent cache-line
>> + * prefetches of buffers for other workers, e.g. when worker 1's buffer is on
>> + * the next cache line to worker 0, we pad this out to two cache lines.
>> + * We can pass up to 8 mbufs at a time in one cacheline.
>> + * There is a separate cacheline for returns in the burst API.
>> + */
>> +struct rte_distributor_buffer {
>> +	volatile int64_t bufptr64[RTE_DIST_BURST_SIZE]
>> +			__rte_cache_aligned; /* <= outgoing to worker */
>> +
>> +	int64_t pad1 __rte_cache_aligned;    /* <= one cache line  */
>> +
>> +	volatile int64_t retptr64[RTE_DIST_BURST_SIZE]
>> +			__rte_cache_aligned; /* <= incoming from worker */
>> +
>> +	int64_t pad2 __rte_cache_aligned;    /* <= one cache line  */
>> +
>> +	int count __rte_cache_aligned;       /* <= number of current mbufs */
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct rte_distributor {
>> +	TAILQ_ENTRY(rte_distributor) next;    /**< Next in list. */
>> +
>> +	char name[RTE_DISTRIBUTOR_NAMESIZE];  /**< Name of the ring. */
>> +	unsigned int num_workers;             /**< Number of workers polling */
>> +	unsigned int alg_type;                /**< Number of alg types */
>> +
>> +	/**>
>> +	 * First cache line in the this array are the tags inflight
>> +	 * on the worker core. Second cache line are the backlog
>> +	 * that are going to go to the worker core.
>> +	 */
>> +	uint16_t in_flight_tags[RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS][RTE_DIST_BURST_SIZE*2]
>> +			__rte_cache_aligned;
>> +
>> +	struct rte_distributor_backlog backlog[RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS]
>> +			__rte_cache_aligned;
>> +
>> +	struct rte_distributor_buffer bufs[RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS];
>> +
>> +	struct rte_distributor_returned_pkts returns;
>> +
>> +	enum rte_distributor_match_function dist_match_fn;
>> +
>> +	struct rte_distributor_v20 *d_v20;
>> +};
>> +
>> +void
>> +find_match_scalar(struct rte_distributor *d,
>> +			uint16_t *data_ptr,
>> +			uint16_t *output_ptr);
>> +
>>   #ifdef __cplusplus
>>   }
>>   #endif
> The last patch claimed that this header file is for structs/definitions
> common between the old and new implementations. These definitions look
> to apply only to the new one, so do they belong in the .c file instead?

The _v20 structs are used as a fallback in the new struct, so probably 
best to have in a common private file.





More information about the dev mailing list