[dpdk-dev] [PATCH ] examples/l3fwd: fix aliasing in port grouping

Ananyev, Konstantin konstantin.ananyev at intel.com
Thu Nov 2 16:52:10 CET 2017



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guduri Prathyusha [mailto:gprathyusha at caviumnetworks.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2017 3:34 PM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Jianbo.Liu at arm.com; guduriprathyusha at gmail.com; Kantecki, Tomasz <tomasz.kantecki at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH ] examples/l3fwd: fix aliasing in port grouping
> 
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 02:46:43PM +0000, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > Hi,
> Hi
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Guduri Prathyusha [mailto:gprathyusha at caviumnetworks.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2017 2:31 PM
> > > To: Kantecki, Tomasz <tomasz.kantecki at intel.com>
> > > Cc: Jianbo.Liu at arm.com; guduriprathyusha at gmail.com; Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org; Guduri
> > > Prathyusha <gprathyusha at caviumnetworks.com>
> > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH ] examples/l3fwd: fix aliasing in port grouping
> > >
> > > With -f-strict-aliasing enabled by default from -O2, gcc > 5.x gives
> > > undefined behavior in port_groupx4. 'pn' and 'pnum' are two different
> > > pointers pointing to same chunk of memory and with -f-strict-aliasing the
> > > pointers are assumed to be pointing to different memory and compiler
> > > reorders instructions that depend on pnum and pn. This breaks port
> > > grouping algorithm.
> > >
> > > This patch eliminates the usage of union and uses memcpy for copying
> > > gptbl[v].pnum to pn. memcpy when applied on built_in constant size does
> > > not call its library implementation but uses appropriate LD and ST
> > > instructions directly and hence no performance overhead.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 569b290cdb36 ("examples/l3fwd: add NEON implementation")
> > > Fixes: af1694d94bf1 ("examples/l3fwd: fix crash with gcc 5")
> > > Signed-off-by: Guduri Prathyusha <gprathyusha at caviumnetworks.com>
> > > ---
> > >  examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_neon.h | 11 +++--------
> > >  examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_sse.h  | 11 +++--------
> > >  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_neon.h b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_neon.h
> > > index 4bc161394..10a602a04 100644
> > > --- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_neon.h
> > > +++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_neon.h
> > > @@ -100,11 +100,6 @@ static inline uint16_t *
> > >  port_groupx4(uint16_t pn[FWDSTEP + 1], uint16_t *lp, uint16x8_t dp1,
> > >  	     uint16x8_t dp2)
> > >  {
> > > -	union {
> > > -		uint16_t u16[FWDSTEP + 1];
> > > -		uint64_t u64;
> > > -	} *pnum = (void *)pn;
> > > -
> > >  	int32_t v;
> > >  	uint16x8_t mask = {1, 2, 4, 8, 0, 0, 0, 0};
> > >
> > > @@ -117,9 +112,9 @@ port_groupx4(uint16_t pn[FWDSTEP + 1], uint16_t *lp, uint16x8_t dp1,
> > >
> > >  	/* if dest port value has changed. */
> > >  	if (v != GRPMSK) {
> > > -		pnum->u64 = gptbl[v].pnum;
> > > -		pnum->u16[FWDSTEP] = 1;
> > > -		lp = pnum->u16 + gptbl[v].idx;
> > > +		rte_memcpy(pn, &gptbl[v].pnum, sizeof(gptbl[v].pnum));
> > > +		pn[FWDSTEP] = 1;
> > > +		lp = pn + gptbl[v].idx;
> > >  	}
> > >
> > >  	return lp;
> > > diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_sse.h b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_sse.h
> > > index 831760f02..79a71d77e 100644
> > > --- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_sse.h
> > > +++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_sse.h
> > > @@ -98,11 +98,6 @@ processx4_step3(struct rte_mbuf *pkt[FWDSTEP], uint16_t dst_port[FWDSTEP])
> > >  static inline uint16_t *
> > >  port_groupx4(uint16_t pn[FWDSTEP + 1], uint16_t *lp, __m128i dp1, __m128i dp2)
> > >  {
> > > -	union {
> > > -		uint16_t u16[FWDSTEP + 1];
> > > -		uint64_t u64;
> > > -	} *pnum = (void *)pn;
> > > -
> > >  	int32_t v;
> > >
> > >  	dp1 = _mm_cmpeq_epi16(dp1, dp2);
> > > @@ -114,9 +109,9 @@ port_groupx4(uint16_t pn[FWDSTEP + 1], uint16_t *lp, __m128i dp1, __m128i dp2)
> > >
> > >  	/* if dest port value has changed. */
> > >  	if (v != GRPMSK) {
> > > -		pnum->u64 = gptbl[v].pnum;
> > > -		pnum->u16[FWDSTEP] = 1;
> > > -		lp = pnum->u16 + gptbl[v].idx;
> > > +		rte_memcpy(pn, &gptbl[v].pnum, sizeof(gptbl[v].pnum));
> > > +		pn[FWDSTEP] = 1;
> > > +		lp = pn + gptbl[v].idx;
> >
> > Could you explain a bit more here - which exactly instructions were reordered
> > and what kind of problems did it cause?
> > Specially on IA?
> 
> This issue is observed on ARM since ARM gcc is more aggressive in
> reordering than x86 gcc.

Ok, then if x86 is not affected why to modify l3fwd_sse.h at all?
Unless there is a reproducible problem with x86 -
my preference would be to keep that file intact.

> In ARM when v != GRPMSK, the following
> instructions ordering is not guarenteed because of strict aliasing.
> 
> lp[0] += gptbl[v].lpv;
> pnum->u64 = gptbl[v].pnum;
> pnum->u16[FWDSTEP] = 1;
> lp = pnum->u16 + gptbl[v].idx;

Ok, so what in particular is reordered by the compiler:

 lp[0] += gptbl[v].lpv; (1)
 pnum->u64 = gptbl[v].pnum; (2)
 pnum->u16[FWDSTEP] = 1;   (3)
 lp = pnum->u16 + gptbl[v].idx; (4)

(2) and (3)?
If so I am not sure how it could be a problem:
they do stores to the different locations.
(1) and (4) as I can see shouldn't be reordered.
Anyway - if you think this a compiler reordering issue,
then adding rte_compiler_barrier() should fix the issue, right?

> 
> That results in wrong lp[0] updation.
> memcpy in this case will avoid this problem.
> 
> > In any case I don't think using rte_memcpy is a good thing to use here:
> > it is a huge inline function - way too much to copy just 64 bit variable.
> 
> I agree that rte_memcpy is overhead in this case but how about using
> memcpy that will not use library implementation if the size is constant.
> memcpy with constant size uses built_in_memcpy that does not add
> performance overhead.

On x86 rte_memcpy() doesn't call libc memcpy() at all - it is a separate function:
ib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_memcpy.h

> 
> Thoughts?

As I said - if x86 is  not affected - please keep l3fwd_sse.h intact.
If it does (still not sure how) - check would compiler barrier help here.
Konstantin 



More information about the dev mailing list