[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-techboard] next techboard meeting (13th, October)
thomas at monjalon.net
Wed Oct 11 14:48:18 CEST 2017
11/10/2017 14:41, Wiles, Keith:
> > On Oct 11, 2017, at 4:36 AM, Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz at 6wind.com> wrote:
> > 1) ABI stability:
> > - one LTS per year
> > - 17.11 to be a LTS
> > - every new API has the "experimental" tag
> > - 3 Acks are needed for deprecation and they should come from different companies
> > reference: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-October/077937.html
> > reference: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-October/077935.html
> I assume the person or company that pushes the notice can be one of the ACKs is this correct?
> Also does the ACK need to come from a person working for a company or can this person be an independent developer? Maybe a very minor point, but someone that is working for a company could Ack independent of the company if so stated. Just be careful how you word the requirement, something like ‘Only one Ack per company or independent developer’
As an open community, we should avoid sorting people per company.
I prefer talking about different areas of interest.
Anyway considering acks is a matter of confidence.
We cannot have strict rules, but we can provide some guidelines.
More information about the dev