[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/2] net/i40e: queue region set and flush

[Zhao1, Wei]

Hi,  Andrey

Yes， it is the number of queue pairs for pf.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chilikin, Andrey
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 9:01 PM
> To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1 at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>; Xing, Beilei
> <beilei.xing at intel.com>; Wu, Jingjing <jingjing.wu at intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/2] net/i40e: queue region set and flush
> 
> Hi Wei,
> 
> Is there number of RX queues configured for the port?
> If main_vsi->nb_used_qps reflects number of enabled RX queues, then it
> can be used.
> 
> Regards,
> Andrey
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Zhao1, Wei
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 4:01 AM
> > To: Chilikin, Andrey <andrey.chilikin at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> > Cc: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>; Xing, Beilei
> > <beilei.xing at intel.com>; Wu, Jingjing <jingjing.wu at intel.com>
> > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/2] net/i40e: queue region set and
> > flush
> >
> > Hi，Andrey
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Chilikin, Andrey
> > > Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 6:07 PM
> > > To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1 at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> > > Cc: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1 at intel.com>; Yigit, Ferruh
> > > <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>; Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing at intel.com>; Wu,
> > > Jingjing <jingjing.wu at intel.com>
> > > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/2] net/i40e: queue region set
> > > and
> > flush
> > >
> > > Hi Wei
> > >
> > > Sorry for the late comment, but I was not included to the patchset
> > > CC list
> > and
> > > just found this new version.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wei Zhao
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 9:56 AM
> > > > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > > > Cc: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1 at intel.com>
> > > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/2] net/i40e: queue region set and
> > > > flush
> > >
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > > +int
> > > > +i40e_flush_queue_region_all_conf(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > > > +	struct i40e_hw *hw, struct i40e_pf *pf, uint16_t on) {
> > > > +	int32_t ret = -EINVAL;
> > > > +	struct i40e_queue_regions *info = &pf->queue_region;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (on) {
> > > > +		i40e_queue_region_pf_flowtype_conf(hw, pf);
> > > > +
> > > > +		ret = i40e_vsi_update_queue_region_mapping(hw, pf);
> > > > +		if (ret != I40E_SUCCESS) {
> > > > +			PMD_DRV_LOG(INFO, "Failed to flush queue region
> > > > mapping.");
> > > > +			return ret;
> > > > +		}
> > > > +
> > > > +		ret = i40e_queue_region_dcb_configure(hw, pf);
> > > > +		if (ret != I40E_SUCCESS) {
> > > > +			PMD_DRV_LOG(INFO, "Failed to flush dcb.");
> > > > +			return ret;
> > > > +		}
> > > > +
> > > > +		return 0;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	info->queue_region_number = 1;
> > > > +	info->region[0].queue_num = 64;
> > >
> > > Why number of queues is hardcoded to a magic number 64? How it will
> > work
> > > if VSI is enabled with smaller number of queues, for example, 1 or
> > > 6? 64 is the maximum number of queues that can be used for RSS, but
> > > VSI might
> > be
> > > created with only few queues.
> >
> > Yes, I know what is your mean, may be it should be change to
> >
> > struct i40e_vsi *main_vsi = pf->main_vsi;
> > info->region[0].queue_num = main_vsi->nb_used_qps;
> >
> > Do you think so?
> >
> > >
> > > > +	info->region[0].queue_start_index = 0;
> > > > +
> > > > +	ret = i40e_vsi_update_queue_region_mapping(hw, pf);
> > > > +	if (ret != I40E_SUCCESS)
> > > > +		PMD_DRV_LOG(INFO, "Failed to flush queue region
> > > > mapping.");
> > > > +
> > > > +	ret = i40e_dcb_init_configure(dev, TRUE);
> > > > +	if (ret != I40E_SUCCESS) {
> > > > +		PMD_DRV_LOG(INFO, "Failed to flush dcb.");
> > > > +		pf->flags &= ~I40E_FLAG_DCB;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	i40e_init_queue_region_conf(dev);
> > > > +
> > > > +	return 0;
> > > > +}