[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/enic: fix multi-process operation

Thomas Monjalon thomas at monjalon.net
Tue Sep 19 00:25:25 CEST 2017


18/09/2017 23:27, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 9/11/2017 7:58 PM, John Daley wrote:
> > - Use rte_malloc() instead of malloc() for the per device 'vdev' structure
> >   so that it can be shared across processes.
> > - Only initialize the device if the process type is RTE_PROC_PRIMARY
> > - Only allow the primary process to do queue setup, start/stop, promisc
> >   allmulticast, mac add/del, mtu.
[...]
> > --- a/drivers/net/enic/enic_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/enic/enic_ethdev.c
> > @@ -142,6 +142,10 @@ enicpmd_dev_filter_ctrl(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> >  static void enicpmd_dev_tx_queue_release(void *txq)
> >  {
> >  	ENICPMD_FUNC_TRACE();
> > +
> > +	if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY)
> > +		return;
> > +
> 
> Hi John,
> 
> I am not sure about these updates. Agree that these functions should
> know process type, but all others PMDs don't do this.
> 
> Added a few more people for comment, but as far I understand its
> application responsibility to NOT call these functions if it is
> secondary process.
> 
> For device init/uninit, that is part of eal_init() and have to be called
> both for primary and secondary process and PMD needs to protect it, for
> other functions application's responsibility.

Yes for now it is the policy.
But it is a gray area and it could be clearer with my "ownership proposal":
	http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-September/074656.html
A secondary process could manage the ports it owns.

Feel free to comment the proposal.


More information about the dev mailing list