[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] vhost: add virtio configuration space messages
Liu, Changpeng
changpeng.liu at intel.com
Fri Apr 20 02:32:04 CEST 2018
Hi Maxime,
We'll submit a new v3 version soon after tested with QEMU 2.12 release.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coquelin at redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2018 10:40 PM
> To: Liu, Changpeng <changpeng.liu at intel.com>; Kulasek, TomaszX
> <tomaszx.kulasek at intel.com>; yliu at fridaylinux.org
> Cc: Verkamp, Daniel <daniel.verkamp at intel.com>; Harris, James R
> <james.r.harris at intel.com>; Wodkowski, PawelX <pawelx.wodkowski at intel.com>;
> dev at dpdk.org; Tan, Jianfeng <jianfeng.tan at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] vhost: add virtio configuration space messages
>
> Hi Changpeng, Tomasz,
>
> Any chance that you resubmit the series now that the Qemu changes adding
> a protocol feature flag has been accepted?
>
> Cheers,
> Maxime
> On 03/28/2018 12:56 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 03/28/2018 12:23 PM, Liu, Changpeng wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coquelin at redhat.com]
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 6:11 PM
> >>> To: Liu, Changpeng <changpeng.liu at intel.com>; Kulasek, TomaszX
> >>> <tomaszx.kulasek at intel.com>; yliu at fridaylinux.org
> >>> Cc: Verkamp, Daniel <daniel.verkamp at intel.com>; Harris, James R
> >>> <james.r.harris at intel.com>; Wodkowski, PawelX
> >>> <pawelx.wodkowski at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org; Tan, Jianfeng
> >>> <jianfeng.tan at intel.com>
> >>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] vhost: add virtio configuration space
> >>> messages
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 03/28/2018 12:03 PM, Liu, Changpeng wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coquelin at redhat.com]
> >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 5:58 PM
> >>>>> To: Liu, Changpeng <changpeng.liu at intel.com>; Kulasek, TomaszX
> >>>>> <tomaszx.kulasek at intel.com>; yliu at fridaylinux.org
> >>>>> Cc: Verkamp, Daniel <daniel.verkamp at intel.com>; Harris, James R
> >>>>> <james.r.harris at intel.com>; Wodkowski, PawelX
> >>>>> <pawelx.wodkowski at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org; Tan, Jianfeng
> >>>>> <jianfeng.tan at intel.com>
> >>>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] vhost: add virtio configuration
> >>>>> space
> >>>>> messages
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 03/28/2018 11:50 AM, Liu, Changpeng wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>> From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coquelin at redhat.com]
> >>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 5:12 PM
> >>>>>>> To: Kulasek, TomaszX <tomaszx.kulasek at intel.com>;
> >>>>>>> yliu at fridaylinux.org
> >>>>>>> Cc: Verkamp, Daniel <daniel.verkamp at intel.com>; Harris, James R
> >>>>>>> <james.r.harris at intel.com>; Wodkowski, PawelX
> >>>>>>> <pawelx.wodkowski at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org; Liu, Changpeng
> >>>>>>> <changpeng.liu at intel.com>; Tan, Jianfeng <jianfeng.tan at intel.com>
> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] vhost: add virtio
> >>>>>>> configuration space
> >>>>>>> messages
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 03/27/2018 05:35 PM, Tomasz Kulasek wrote:
> >>>>>>>> This patch adds new vhost user messages GET_CONFIG and SET_CONFIG
> >>>>> used
> >>>>>>>> for get/set virtio device's configuration space.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu at intel.com>
> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Kulasek <tomaszx.kulasek at intel.com>
> >>>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>>> Changes in v2:
> >>>>>>>> - code cleanup
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost.h | 4 ++++
> >>>>>>>> lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>>>> lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>>>> 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost.h
> >>>>>>>> b/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost.h
> >>>>>>>> index d332069..fe30518 100644
> >>>>>>>> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost.h
> >>>>>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost.h
> >>>>>>>> @@ -84,6 +84,10 @@ struct vhost_device_ops {
> >>>>>>>> int (*new_connection)(int vid);
> >>>>>>>> void (*destroy_connection)(int vid);
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> + int (*get_config)(int vid, uint8_t *config, uint32_t
> >>>>>>>> config_len);
> >>>>>>>> + int (*set_config)(int vid, uint8_t *config, uint32_t offset,
> >>>>>>>> + uint32_t len, uint32_t flags);
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> void *reserved[2]; /**< Reserved for future extension */
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> You are breaking the ABI, as you grow the size of the ops struct.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Also, I'm wondering if we shouldn't have a different ops for
> >>>>>>> external
> >>>>>>> backends. Here these ops are more intended to the application, we
> >>>>>>> could
> >>>>>>> have a specific ops struct for external backends IMHO.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> };
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
> >>>>>>>> b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
> >>>>>>>> index 90ed211..0ed6a5a 100644
> >>>>>>>> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
> >>>>>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
> >>>>>>>> @@ -50,6 +50,8 @@ static const char
> >>>>> *vhost_message_str[VHOST_USER_MAX]
> >>>>>>> = {
> >>>>>>>> [VHOST_USER_NET_SET_MTU] = "VHOST_USER_NET_SET_MTU",
> >>>>>>>> [VHOST_USER_SET_SLAVE_REQ_FD] =
> >>>>>>> "VHOST_USER_SET_SLAVE_REQ_FD",
> >>>>>>>> [VHOST_USER_IOTLB_MSG] = "VHOST_USER_IOTLB_MSG",
> >>>>>>>> + [VHOST_USER_GET_CONFIG] = "VHOST_USER_GET_CONFIG",
> >>>>>>>> + [VHOST_USER_SET_CONFIG] = "VHOST_USER_SET_CONFIG",
> >>>>>>>> };
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> static uint64_t
> >>>>>>>> @@ -1355,6 +1357,7 @@ vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd)
> >>>>>>>> * would cause a dead lock.
> >>>>>>>> */
> >>>>>>>> switch (msg.request.master) {
> >>>>>>>> + case VHOST_USER_SET_CONFIG:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It seems VHOST_USER_GET_CONFIG is missing here.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> case VHOST_USER_SET_FEATURES:
> >>>>>>>> case VHOST_USER_SET_PROTOCOL_FEATURES:
> >>>>>>>> case VHOST_USER_SET_OWNER:
> >>>>>>>> @@ -1380,6 +1383,25 @@ vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd)
> >>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> switch (msg.request.master) {
> >>>>>>>> + case VHOST_USER_GET_CONFIG:
> >>>>>>>> + if (dev->notify_ops->get_config(dev->vid,
> >>>>>>> Please check ->get_config is set before calling it.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> + msg.payload.config.region,
> >>>>>>>> + msg.payload.config.size) != 0) {
> >>>>>>>> + msg.size = sizeof(uint64_t);
> >>>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>>> + send_vhost_reply(fd, &msg);
> >>>>>>>> + break;
> >>>>>>>> + case VHOST_USER_SET_CONFIG:
> >>>>>>>> + if ((dev->notify_ops->set_config(dev->vid,
> >>>>>>> Ditto.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> + msg.payload.config.region,
> >>>>>>>> + msg.payload.config.offset,
> >>>>>>>> + msg.payload.config.size,
> >>>>>>>> + msg.payload.config.flags)) != 0) {
> >>>>>>>> + ret = 1;
> >>>>>>>> + } else {
> >>>>>>>> + ret = 0;
> >>>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ret = dev->notify_ops->set_config instead?
> >>>>>>>> + break;
> >>>>>>>> case VHOST_USER_GET_FEATURES:
> >>>>>>>> msg.payload.u64 = vhost_user_get_features(dev);
> >>>>>>>> msg.size = sizeof(msg.payload.u64);
> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.h
> >>>>>>>> b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.h
> >>>>>>>> index d4bd604..25cc026 100644
> >>>>>>>> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.h
> >>>>>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.h
> >>>>>>>> @@ -14,6 +14,11 @@
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> #define VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS 8
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> +/*
> >>>>>>>> + * Maximum size of virtio device config space
> >>>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>>> +#define VHOST_USER_MAX_CONFIG_SIZE 256
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> #define VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_MQ 0
> >>>>>>>> #define VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_LOG_SHMFD 1
> >>>>>>>> #define VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_RARP 2
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Shouldn't there be a protocol feature associated to these new
> >>>>>>> messages?
> >>>>>>> Else how QEMU knows the backend supports it or not?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I looked at QEMU code and indeed no protocol feature associated,
> >>>>>>> that's
> >>>>>>> strange...
> >>>>>> Nice to have, for now not all the QEMU host driver need to get this
> >>>>> configuration space from slave backend
> >>>>>> when getting start. This message can be used for migration of
> >>>>>> vhost-user
> >>>>> devices.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So if QEMU sends this message but the DPDK version does not support it
> >>>>> yet, vhost_user_msg_handler() will return an error ("vhost read
> >>>>> incorrect message") and the socket will be closed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> How do we overcome this? I think we really need a spec update ASAP,
> >>>>> before QEMU v2.12 is out (-rc1 already).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Do you have time to take care of this?
> >>>> For now there are no other users except us care about this message,
> >>>> :), it's no
> >>> hurry.
> >>>> I can take this after QEMU 2.12 release adding a new protocol
> >>>> feature bit.
> >>>
> >>> Are you sure?
> >>> If I understand the code correctly, as the guest writes in config regs
> >>> of a virtio-blk device, .set_config callback will be called.
> >> Exactly.
> >>>
> >>> If you have a vhost-user backend, it will receive the SET_CONFIG
> >>> request, no?
> >> For now this only enabled for QEMU vhost-user-blk driver, QEMU
> >> virtio-blk driver didn't have such issue.
> >
> > Right.
> > But it will be really painful to manage for example for cross-version
> > live migration. Or when you'll want to use QEMU v2.13+ with a DPDK
> > v18.05 backend, the protocol feature won't be negotiated.
> >
> > Really, this is important to get it right at the beginning.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Maxime
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Maxime
> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Maxime
More information about the dev
mailing list