[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] libs/power: add p-state driver compatibility

Thomas Monjalon thomas at monjalon.net
Fri Dec 21 01:33:52 CET 2018


21/12/2018 01:30, Thomas Monjalon:
> 20/12/2018 15:52, Hunt, David:
> > On 19/12/2018 8:31 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 19/12/2018 10:09, Hunt, David:
> > >> On 19/12/2018 3:18 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > >>> 14/12/2018 14:11, Liang Ma:
> > >>>> Previously, in order to use the power library, it was necessary
> > >>>> for the user to disable the intel_pstate driver by adding
> > >>>> “intel_pstate=disable” to the kernel command line for the system,
> > >>>> which causes the acpi_cpufreq driver to be loaded in its place.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This patch adds the ability for the power library use the intel-pstate
> > >>>> driver.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> It adds a new suite of functions behind the current power library API,
> > >>>> and will seamlessly set up the user facing API function pointers to
> > >>>> the relevant functions depending on whether the system is running with
> > >>>> acpi_cpufreq kernel driver, intel_pstate kernel driver or in a guest,
> > >>>> using kvm. The library API and ABI is unchanged.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Liang Ma <liang.j.ma at intel.com>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Reviewed-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov at intel.com>
> > >>>> ---
> > >>> Please write a changelog when sending a new version.
> > >>>
> > >>> Dave, any comment on this patch?
> > >>
> > >> Looks good to me.
> > >>
> > >> Acked-by: David Hunt <david.hunt at intel.com>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>> --- /dev/null
> > >>>> +++ b/lib/librte_power/power_pstate_cpufreq.c
> > >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,770 @@
> > >>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> > >>>> + * Copyright(c) 2018-2018 Intel Corporation
> > >>> Something wrong here :)
> > >> Yes, should simply be "Copyright(c) 2018 Intel Corporation"
> > >
> > > There is also a compilation error with meson:
> > >
> > > lib/librte_power/rte_power_empty_poll.h:20:10: fatal error:
> > > 	rte_timer.h: No such file or directory
> > >
> > > Clearly, some quality checks are missing.
> > >
> > > I'm afraid we won't have any patch for power library in 19.02.
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Thomas,
> > 
> > We have just pushed a v4, and tested with make, meson/ninja, and several 
> > different build environments. I believe this version should be 
> > acceptable for 19.02.
> 
> I don't think so.
> I will give more comments in v4 and will give up for 19.02.

Sorry I looked at the wrong things.
The v4 looks OK.




More information about the dev mailing list