[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/7] net/bnxt: add 100G speed detection
Ajit Khaparde
ajit.khaparde at broadcom.com
Fri Jan 26 18:33:45 CET 2018
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>
wrote:
> On 1/25/2018 10:47 PM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
> > When the driver is loaded on a 100G NIC, the port speed is not
> > displayed correctly. Parse the 100G speed before displaying it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde at broadcom.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c
> > index 8fac05251..d412e51fc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c
> > @@ -2139,6 +2139,8 @@ static uint32_t bnxt_parse_hw_link_speed(uint16_t
> hw_link_speed)
> > break;
> > case HWRM_PORT_PHY_QCFG_OUTPUT_LINK_SPEED_50GB:
> > eth_link_speed = ETH_SPEED_NUM_50G;
>
> This case doesn't have a "break" statement, which looks like
> unintentional, but
> if it is intentional please put /* Fallthrough */ comment to prevent build
> error
> [1].
>
No. Its unintentional. I copy pasted those lines from the test setup and
missed it.
I am sending a fresh set. Thanks
>
> [1]
> ...dpdk/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c: In function
> ‘bnxt_parse_hw_link_speed’:
> ...dpdk/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c:2141:18: error: this statement may
> fall
> through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=]
> eth_link_speed = ETH_SPEED_NUM_50G;
> ...dpdk/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c:2142:2: note: here
> case HWRM_PORT_PHY_QCFG_OUTPUT_LINK_SPEED_100GB:
> ^~~~
>
> > + case HWRM_PORT_PHY_QCFG_OUTPUT_LINK_SPEED_100GB:
> > + eth_link_speed = ETH_SPEED_NUM_100G;
> > break;
> > case HWRM_PORT_PHY_QCFG_OUTPUT_LINK_SPEED_2GB:
> > default:
> >
>
>
More information about the dev
mailing list