[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 8/9] net/virtio: add in-order Rx/Tx into selection

Maxime Coquelin maxime.coquelin at redhat.com
Mon Jul 2 17:18:18 CEST 2018



On 07/02/2018 02:41 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> 
> 
> On 07/02/2018 01:24 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 07/02/2018 03:56 PM, Marvin Liu wrote:
>>> After IN_ORDER Rx/Tx paths added, need to update Rx/Tx path selection
>>> logic.
>>>
>>> Rx path select logic: If IN_ORDER and merge-able are enabled will select
>>> IN_ORDER Rx path. If IN_ORDER is enabled, Rx offload and merge-able are
>>> disabled will select simple Rx path. Otherwise will select normal Rx
>>> path.
>>>
>>> Tx path select logic: If IN_ORDER is enabled will select IN_ORDER Tx
>>> path. Otherwise will select default Tx path.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marvin Liu <yong.liu at intel.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/virtio.rst b/doc/guides/nics/virtio.rst
>>> index 46e292c4d..7c099fb7c 100644
>>> --- a/doc/guides/nics/virtio.rst
>>> +++ b/doc/guides/nics/virtio.rst
>>> @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ The packet transmission flow is:
>>>   Virtio PMD Rx/Tx Callbacks
>>>   --------------------------
>>> -Virtio driver has 3 Rx callbacks and 2 Tx callbacks.
>>> +Virtio driver has 4 Rx callbacks and 3 Tx callbacks.
>>>   Rx callbacks:
>>> @@ -215,6 +215,9 @@ Rx callbacks:
>>>      Vector version without mergeable Rx buffer support, also fixes 
>>> the available
>>>      ring indexes and uses vector instructions to optimize performance.
>>> +#. ``virtio_recv_mergeable_pkts_inorder``:
>>> +   In-order version with mergeable Rx buffer support.
>>> +
>>>   Tx callbacks:
>>>   #. ``virtio_xmit_pkts``:
>>> @@ -223,6 +226,8 @@ Tx callbacks:
>>>   #. ``virtio_xmit_pkts_simple``:
>>>      Vector version fixes the available ring indexes to optimize 
>>> performance.
>>> +#. ``virtio_xmit_pkts_inorder``:
>>> +   In-order version.
>>>   By default, the non-vector callbacks are used:
>>> @@ -254,6 +259,12 @@ Example of using the vector version of the 
>>> virtio poll mode driver in
>>>      testpmd -l 0-2 -n 4 -- -i --tx-offloads=0x0 --rxq=1 --txq=1 
>>> --nb-cores=1
>>> +In-order callbacks only work on simulated virtio user vdev.
>>> +
>>> +*   For Rx: If mergeable Rx buffers is enabled and in-order is 
>>> enabled then
>>> +    ``virtio_xmit_pkts_inorder`` is used.
>>> +
>>> +*   For Tx: If in-order is enabled then ``virtio_xmit_pkts_inorder`` 
>>> is used.
>>>   Interrupt mode
>>>   --------------
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c 
>>> b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
>>> index df50a571a..df7981ddb 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
>>> @@ -1320,6 +1320,11 @@ set_rxtx_funcs(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
>>>           PMD_INIT_LOG(INFO, "virtio: using simple Rx path on port %u",
>>>               eth_dev->data->port_id);
>>>           eth_dev->rx_pkt_burst = virtio_recv_pkts_vec;
>>> +    } else if (hw->use_inorder_rx) {
>>> +        PMD_INIT_LOG(INFO,
>>> +            "virtio: using inorder mergeable buffer Rx path on port 
>>> %u",
>>> +            eth_dev->data->port_id);
>>> +        eth_dev->rx_pkt_burst = &virtio_recv_mergeable_pkts_inorder;
>>>       } else if (vtpci_with_feature(hw, VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF)) {
>>>           PMD_INIT_LOG(INFO,
>>>               "virtio: using mergeable buffer Rx path on port %u",
>>> @@ -1335,6 +1340,10 @@ set_rxtx_funcs(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
>>>           PMD_INIT_LOG(INFO, "virtio: using simple Tx path on port %u",
>>>               eth_dev->data->port_id);
>>>           eth_dev->tx_pkt_burst = virtio_xmit_pkts_simple;
>>> +    } else if (hw->use_inorder_tx) {
>>> +        PMD_INIT_LOG(INFO, "virtio: using inorder Tx path on port %u",
>>> +            eth_dev->data->port_id);
>>> +        eth_dev->tx_pkt_burst = virtio_xmit_pkts_inorder;
>>>       } else {
>>>           PMD_INIT_LOG(INFO, "virtio: using standard Tx path on port 
>>> %u",
>>>               eth_dev->data->port_id);
>>> @@ -1874,20 +1883,27 @@ virtio_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>>>       hw->use_simple_rx = 1;
>>>       hw->use_simple_tx = 1;
>>> +    if (vtpci_with_feature(hw, VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER)) {
>>> +        /* Simple Tx not compatible with in-order ring */
>>> +        hw->use_inorder_tx = 1;
>>> +        hw->use_simple_tx = 0;
>>> +        if (vtpci_with_feature(hw, VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF)) {
>>> +            hw->use_inorder_rx = 1;
>>> +            hw->use_simple_rx = 0;
>>> +        } else {
>>> +            hw->use_inorder_rx = 0;
>>> +            if (rx_offloads & (DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
>>> +                       DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM))
>>> +                hw->use_simple_rx = 0;
>> It is applied, but I think this is still not good.
>>
>> Simple Rx is set to 1 by default, so if IN_ORDER isn't negotiated,
>> and UDP/TCP_CSUM is enabled, simple Rx keeps being selected.
>>
>> I'll fix it in my series that I'm doing on top.
> 
> Actually, after discussion with Ferruh, I fixed it directly in the patch.

Running some more tests, I noticed that it is still broken.
For example the case where host does not support IN_ORDER.
If mergeable buffer is negotiated, the simple path gets selected, which
is wrong.

I fixed that directly in the patch.

Regards,
Maxime
> Thanks,
> Maxime
> 
>> Regards,
>> Maxime
>>
>>> +        }
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>>   #if defined RTE_ARCH_ARM64 || defined RTE_ARCH_ARM
>>>       if (!rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_NEON)) {
>>>           hw->use_simple_rx = 0;
>>>           hw->use_simple_tx = 0;
>>>       }
>>>   #endif
>>> -    if (vtpci_with_feature(hw, VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF)) {
>>> -        hw->use_simple_rx = 0;
>>> -        hw->use_simple_tx = 0;
>>> -    }
>>> -
>>> -    if (rx_offloads & (DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
>>> -               DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM))
>>> -        hw->use_simple_rx = 0;
>>>       return 0;
>>>   }
>>>


More information about the dev mailing list