[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/2] app/testpmd implement VXLAN/NVGRE Encap/Decap

Ferruh Yigit ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Wed Jul 4 16:54:32 CEST 2018


On 7/2/2018 11:40 AM, Mohammad Abdul Awal wrote:
> 
> On 27/06/2018 12:45, Nelio Laranjeiro wrote:
>> This series adds an easy and maintainable configuration version support for
>> those two actions for 18.08 by using global variables in testpmd to store the
>> necessary information for the tunnel encapsulation.  Those variables are used
>> in conjunction of RTE_FLOW_ACTION_{VXLAN,NVGRE}_ENCAP action to create easily
>> the action for flows.
>>
>> A common way to use it:
>>
>>   set vxlan ipv4 4 4 4 127.0.0.1 128.0.0.1 11:11:11:11:11:11 22:22:22:22:22:22
>>   flow create 0 ingress pattern end actions vxlan_encap / queue index 0 / end
>>
>>   set vxlan ipv6 4 4 4 ::1 ::2222 11:11:11:11:11:11 22:22:22:22:22:22
>>   flow create 0 ingress pattern end actions vxlan_encap / queue index 0 / end
>>
>>   set nvgre ipv4 4 127.0.0.1 128.0.0.1 11:11:11:11:11:11 22:22:22:22:22:22
>>   flow create 0 ingress pattern end actions nvgre_encap / queue index 0 / end
>>
>>   set nvgre ipv6 4 ::1 ::2222 11:11:11:11:11:11 22:22:22:22:22:22
>>   flow create 0 ingress pattern end actions nvgre_encap / queue index 0 / end
>>
>> This also replace the proposal done by Mohammad Abdul Awal [1] which handles
>> in a more complex way for the same work.
>>
>> Note this API has already a modification planned for 18.11 [2] thus those
>> series should have a limited life for a single release.
>>
>> [1] https://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-May/101403.html
>> [2] https://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-June/103485.html
>>
>> Changes in v7:
>>
>> - add missing documentation added in v5 and removed in v6 by mistake.
>>
>> Changes in v6:
>>
>> - fix compilation under redhat 7.5 with gcc 4.8.5 20150623
>>
>> Changes in v5:
>>
>> - fix documentation generation.
>> - add more explanation on how to generate several encapsulated flows.
>>
>> Changes in v4:
>>
>> - fix big endian issue on vni and tni.
>> - add samples to the documentation.
>> - set the VXLAN UDP source port to 0 by default to let the driver generate it
>>    from the inner hash as described in the RFC 7348.
>> - use default rte flow mask for each item.
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>>
>> - support VLAN in the outer encapsulation.
>> - fix the documentation with missing arguments.
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>>
>> - add default IPv6 values for NVGRE encapsulation.
>> - replace VXLAN to NVGRE in comments concerning NVGRE layer.
>>
>> Nelio Laranjeiro (2):
>>    app/testpmd: add VXLAN encap/decap support
>>    app/testpmd: add NVGRE encap/decap support
>>
>>   app/test-pmd/cmdline.c                      | 252 ++++++++++++++++++
>>   app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c                 | 274 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>   app/test-pmd/testpmd.c                      |  32 +++
>>   app/test-pmd/testpmd.h                      |  32 +++
>>   doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst |  82 ++++++
>>   5 files changed, 672 insertions(+)
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have one concern in terms of usability though.
> In testpmd, the rte_flow command line options have auto-completion with 
> "<item_name> <item_name_value>" format which make using the command very 
> much user friendly.
> 
> For the command "set vxlan ipv4 4 4 4 127.0.0.1 128.0.0.1 
> 11:11:11:11:11:11 22:22:22:22:22:22", it does not look much user 
> friendly to me. A user may easily lose track of sequence of 9 param 
> items. It would be much user friendly if the options would be like below 
> and has auto-completion.
> 
> set vxlan ip_ver <ip_ver-value> vni <vni-value> udp_src <udp_src-value> 
> udp-dst <udp_dst-value> ip_src <ip_src-value> ip_dst <ip_dst-value> 
> eth_src <eth_src-value> eth_dst <eth_dst-value>

Hi Nelio, Adrien,

I tend to agree with Awal here, this is to forget/confuse and key-value pairs
makes it easier to use.

Meanwhile this is an usability improvement and I prefer not to block this patch
for this.

What is your comment on this, how should we proceed?

Thanks,
ferruh

> 
> This way an user may never feel confused. Can maintainers comment on 
> this point please?
> 
> Regards,
> Awal.
> 



More information about the dev mailing list